While you were robbed blind at the pump this year (and GOP blamed Biden), Exxon made $55,700,000,000 in profits.

Over $1 billion per week.

$152,600,000 per day.

$1,766.24 per *second.*

"Congress should heed #POTUS’s call and pass my bill to claw back Big Oil’s excess profits."

- Sheldon Whitehouse, Senator

https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/after-record-year-for-big-oil-whitehouse-revamps-bill-to-claw-back-windfall-profits-and-send-relief-to-the-american-public

#senwhitehouse
#VoteDem2024

After Record Year for Big Oil, Whitehouse Revamps Bill to Claw Back Windfall Profits and Send Relief to the American Public | U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island

The Official U.S. Senate website of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island

@skykiss ☝🏻

Claw back all excess profits in all sectors, and of course oil and gas 🔥

Here in Canada too

#taxes #OilAndGas #profits #fair #USpolitics #cdnpoli

@alanrycroft

Excess profits is a funny term.

It’s one person deciding how much someone else should make, beyond their costs.

So like, I think you made too much last year. I’m going to call back some of your income because it was too much that you made.

Guess you should have spent more on groceries!

@skykiss

@volkris @skykiss

It's more like progressive income tax that we already have for individuals

But extended to corporations

As profit levels rise, so should corporate taxes

#FairTaxation #taxes

@alanrycroft

The main reason I disagree is that since corporations aren’t people, it skews the costs to actual people as corporations are taxed.

The corporation is just going to pass the cost of taxes along to customers, often harming the ones that can least afford to pay increased prices.

So that kind of taxation strikes me as particularly unfair.

But the other reason I disagree is that it digs into the incentive corporations have to be efficient, including things like energy efficiency.

I WANT the corporation to experience a benefit from things like investing in less polluting equipment.

Tax away the incentive to be more efficient and you get less efficiency.

@skykiss

@volkris @skykiss

I'll let the market sort out corporate efficiency

I'm more interested in fair, progressive taxation for all

#taxes #FairTaxation

@alanrycroft keep in mind that the market considers taxation when it sorts things out.

So again, if you put taxes on corporate profits, that means the market has less incentive to pursue efficiency.

If the company is going to lose money through either buying more efficient vehicles or taxation then there’s a lot less reason to do the first than the second. It’s going to lose the money either way. So the market won’t worry so much about efficiency.

That’s the problem.

@skykiss

@volkris @alanrycroft @skykiss

Investing in your company lowers your net income and lowers your taxes. That's why companies invested more into their companies when marginal tax rates were high.

@Ignatz

And if we don’t want that to be the case, we can change it.

There is some social benefit to investing in companies, but if we don’t think that benefit is worthy of the tax policy, okay, we can stop allowing people to deduct investment activities from their income.

@alanrycroft @skykiss

@alanrycroft

Such a statement is like talking about cancer treatment, but extended to people without cancer: it’s no minor thing to extend the concept from the one situation to the other.

@skykiss

@volkris @alanrycroft @skykiss Unfortunately most regular citizens are not subsidized like the gas and oil industry. And, when you take into consideration the related climate damage (that the oil companies knew about in the ‘70’s but hid the data) the costs of us letting them garner profits while being subsidized and paying less taxes than an average citizen…. 1/2
SEN. WHITEHOUSE ON FOSSIL FUEL SUBSIDIES: “WE ARE SUBSIDIZING THE DANGER” | U.S. Senate Committee On The Budget

The Official U.S. Senate Committee On The Budget

@pansel_arrington

Profits do not create costs. That’s just not how legitimate accounting works.

Profits are income minus costs, profits are the situation after costs are already deducted, so it just doesn’t make mathematical sense to talk about profits creating costs.

Exxon Mobil may have submitted money to the US Treasury but you know where that money came from? Customers.

Every person who went to an Exxon gas station was charged to pay that tax bill. No matter how poor you were, no matter how much you were struggling to balance your checking account at the end of the month, you ended up paying that taxation which is a huge problem.

Corporations aren’t people. We should not talk as if they are for the sake of taxation.

Thank goodness Exxon was able to minimize its taxation as much as it did or else it would have had to take even more from a whole lot of people who couldn’t afford it.

@alanrycroft @skykiss

@pansel_arrington

Oh you’re going into that whole thing about the gas and oil industry being subsidized. So much of that is easily debunked, based on these sensationalized claims that just don’t really match how the federal government functions.

Those claims make for a good story, they get a lot of clicks, but they’re just not reality.

But regardless of that, it still doesn’t excuse what we’re talking about here. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

Let’s get out of messing with the corporate balance sheets. Whether that’s oil industry or any other. Let’s just avoid that complication altogether.

You’re talking about the average person versus corporations, but let’s just talk about people paying their fair share, and corporations are not people.

Every bit that you tax from a corporation eventually comes from a person, so let’s not go through that taxation through other steps where we cannot make it progressive because we can’t control who is buying from the corporation.

@alanrycroft @skykiss

@skykiss While a profit clawback would make us feel better, it doesn't change the demand side of the equation. Tell your member of congress to cosponsor the Energy Innovation Act to put a #priceoncarbon #climateaction https://cclusa.org/action
Take Action for Climate | Citizens' Climate Lobby

To pass climate policy, we need Congress to hear a chorus of many different voices calling or emailing their offices in a steady stream.

Citizens' Climate Lobby
@skykiss
Gas prices and Exxon’s net income were lower with Trump. Biden is the windfall for big oil.
Exxon Annual Net Income:
2022…$55.7B
2021…$23.0B
2020…$-22.4B
2019…$14.3B
2018…$20.8B
2017…$19.7B
2016…$7.8B
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/XOM/exxon/net-income
Exxon Net Income 2010-2023 | XOM

Exxon annual/quarterly net income history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023. Net income can be defined as company's net profit or loss after all revenues, income items, and expenses have been accounted for. <ul style='margin-top:10px;'> <li>Exxon net income for the quarter ending December 31, 2023 was <strong>$7.630B</strong>, a <strong>40.16% decline</strong> year-over-year.</li> <li>Exxon net income for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023 was <strong>$36.010B</strong>, a <strong>35.4% decline</strong> year-over-year.</li> <li>Exxon annual net income for 2023 was <strong>$36.01B</strong>, a <strong>35.4% decline</strong> from 2022.</li> <li>Exxon annual net income for 2022 was <strong>$55.74B</strong>, a <strong>141.93% increase</strong> from 2021.</li> <li>Exxon annual net income for 2021 was <strong>$23.04B</strong>, a <strong>202.67% decline</strong> from 2020.</li> </ul>

@skykiss how many gas stations sell exxon fuel? We could then hav an estimate of how much exxon profit there was per gas station per day.
@skykiss
If Americans would boycott EXXON for one month this purging would cease. We have the power to break them, but most people can't be bothered.
#BoycottExxon
@GatekeepKen @skykiss Do you mean just boycotting the gas stations?
@futurebird @skykiss
No, we take on the Biggest Thief, Exxon. Just boycott them Nationwide for one month so their dealers bleed. It will effect the price of gas Nationwide when the drop their prices to dirt levels. #BoycottExxon

@futurebird @GatekeepKen @skykiss The closest America 🇺🇸 came to boycotting a specific gas station was BP after the oil pipe busted open in the Gulf of Mexico: https://www.npr.org/2010/05/25/127110643/as-bp-backlash-grows-so-do-calls-for-boycott

Unless people can see #Exxon damaging the environment, I do not see any boycott emerging in the #UnitedStates 🇺🇸.

@darnell @futurebird @skykiss
There was no Nationwide ban on BP, there was a small amount of outrage but nothing that hit the airwaves.
@skykiss if you believe in climate change the fuel has to be expensive. The question is where the money should go...
@skykiss
I have not pumped Exxon since the Valdez polluted Alaska.
Do people not give a shit about the number one polluter on the planet?
@skykiss And yet WE ARE STILL SUBSIDIZING THE FOSSIL FUELS INDUSTRY.

Think about that for a moment. $1,766.24 per second profit and we are
STILL subsidizing them.