FYI: Scientific research conducted at #MaunaKea and #MaunaLoa is NOT conflict free. At this time, it is unethical and as such, unsustainable, no matter how amazing the results. Those results are obtained by colonialist exploitation, against will of Hawaiian people.

I love astronomy. I used to research philosophy of space exploration. But what is being done in Hawaii in name of science is just wrong. Scientific community's failure to respect Hawaiians and their ancestral land is shameful.

Both of these volcanos are sacred to native Hawaiians. They have protested peacefully against colonialist exploitation conducted in name of science for a long time -and been consistently ignored.

The way Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea are being exploited in name of science *is* deeply hurtful to people who have already suffered much in hands of American colonialism.

It is not enough to do tokenistic nods to Hawaiian culture when it is convenient while at the same time blatantly ignoring what Hawaiian people would truly want.

Dismissing indigenous faiths as "backwards and primitive"- as etymology of the word "heathen" suggests- is an old colonialist tactic. It is not based on objective thinking but on Western sense of supremacy and belief that Europeans know what is best for everyone. One can not form an objective opinion about something they can not begin to understand...and sense of supremacy and self-absorbedness are destructive to people's ability to understand anything.

Personally speaking: as much as I love astronomy and science, I think that it would be best if scientists packed their bags and left sacred lands to be until Hawaiians tell otherwise.

What scientific community could learn about humility, decency and basic respect for those unlike them, would be more valuable to our species than the most amazing discoveries.

#Hawaii #AlohaAina

Peter Apo: Let’s Hope For A Respectful Dialogue About Mauna Kea

Hawaiians are not unanimous in their opposition to the telescope and there is no religious authority to make decisions.

Honolulu Civil Beat

@brianvastag

Are you arguing, that an entire nation is not same thing as a single-minded cult?

Yes, you can find people with different opinions from every relatively sizable group.

Not exactly big news and not an argument.

@ReimanSaara I don''t follow your argument. Who is the single-minded cult in this scenario you're trying to paint?
@brianvastag I'm not trying to paint anything. You said that there existing different opinions among Hawaiians (as opposed to them being brainwashed cultists) is somehow a relevant point here. In my next toot, I explained (briefly), how it is really not.
@ReimanSaara Not sure if you know the history of TMT but the telescope people negotiated with a formal group of Native Hawaiians who had authority over the mountain and made many concessions. But then another group of Native Hawaiians declared themselves leaders and said those Native Hawaiians don't speak for us and started the anti-TM protests.

@brianvastag I have actually followed the situation for some years now. Are you aware of how Kingdom of Hawai'i ceased to be?

"Concession" is a magical word here. Who are those telescope people to make "concessions" to children of the land?

This is not an equal situation- and at some level, you appear to be aware of that. In unequal situations, some members of an oppressed minority always take side of oppressors for various reasons. It's not unique to this case. I think a broader historical context should be adopted here.

@ReimanSaara Yes, I live in Hawaii and am very aware of the colonial history.

Recent polls show 50-60% of people who identify as Native Hawaiian want the TMT built.

You seem to be unaware of this fact.

@brianvastag

Like I said, it is not that difficult to find people from minority who agree with those who oppress them even if oppression is blatant. I have not yet encoutered a minority where this does not happen. Situations involving power imbalance are nuanced in ways that can not be properly reduced to simple yes/no answers.

Like I said: my view is based on a broader historical perspective, on what I know of minority issues in general as well as on applied ethics & ethics of science, and on top of that on my understanding on how indigenous faith (on more general level, obviously I don't know much about Hawaiian faith in particular) works.

What dimensions have you considered while forming your view?

@ReimanSaara
Some random things that people outside of Hawaii, and personally unfamiliar with traditional Hawaiian culture, are often not aware of:
*ALL land and water was sacred to Hawaiians, as they were the source of all life.
*Mauna Kea itself has never been a special sacred site, unlike many other locations, and other natural features, which were associated with various rituals, traditions, and taboos.
*The ali’i, Hawaiian nobility, whose persons were also sacred, and who had absolute authority over commoners, had fully embraced Western ways
- clothing, technology, lifestyle, religion - and had abolished the kapu system, and thus the traditional religion, in the early 18th century.
*Almost two hundred years later (and a few years before the overthrow of the monarchy), one of the last ali’i officially restored many non-religious Hawaiian cultural traditions (which had been banned by Christians), although some had continued to be practiced in secret.

@Hannah
The concept of sacredness in Heathenism is very different from what it means in large religions (eg. Christianity). It is very difficult to explain to people who are unfamiliar with Heathen worldview.
A sacred site is not same as a temple site, such as heiau.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that in Hawaiian mythology Mauna Kea is the oldest child of Wakea and Papawalinu’u, the male and female sources of all life and, as a sign of respect, humans are not supposed to live on its summit.

To me, it seems that respect -or lack of it- is the core issue here. The problem is not building one more telescope. It is building one more telescope, and even then being unable to say that there are finally enough telescopes. Summit of Mauna Kea already has several telescopes. But *enough* telescopes? Never, if you ask scientists. Western thinking seriously struggles with the idea of "enough"- being content with something if one has resources to strive for more. That is logic of a cancer cell... and precisely same attitude is a problem under global problems such as overconsumption and climate crisis.

Also, an indigenous faith cannot be "abolished", as its essence is not collection of certain beliefs and myths but relationship between humans and reality itself. Sky and Earth, ocean and Ancestors. Losing myths and rituals etc. is like losing a map- it certainly can turn traveling into being lost and confused. It is a huge deal...but still not comparable to loss of land itself. As long as land remains, in time, it is possible to make new maps. As long as the islands and sky and ocean exist, the source of what is expressed in myths and rites survives and can be found again by new generations of people.

Survival of unsustainable American way of life is at question...survival of indigenous faiths, not so much.