So in addition to cluttering up low earth orbit, wrecking terrestrial astronomy, creating the potential for a Kessler Syndrome cascade which could close access to space, and creating a national security nightmare, Starlink internet access is a climate catastrophe using up to 30 times more carbon footprint per internet subscriber than land based internet.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2394949-starlink-carbon-footprint-up-to-30-times-size-of-land-based-internet/

Starlink carbon footprint up to 30 times size of land-based internet

The satellite internet services provided by SpaceX Starlink, Eutelsat OneWeb or Amazon Kuiper will come with a carbon footprint much higher than that associated with land-based alternatives

New Scientist

@mastodonmigration

Are you going to be the one to tell people who live in the Solomons or Ethiopia or rural Oklahoma that they can't have internet because the "carbon footprint" is too big?

Starlink and services like it exist because for a lot of people there aren't other options. And when there are, they can be heavily censored.

So yeah, we should make our satellites less reflective, clean up light pollution, and cut CO₂.

But let's keep the internet on for everyone while we do that, ok?

@seth @mastodonmigration starlink is not available yet in the solomon islands or ethiopia

next year, according to the map but who knows

the Solomon islands have built their own cable though in the meantime

@mmby @mastodonmigration Internet access in the Solomon islands is tough. Even with that cable they have, coverage out there is very poor. Good (and cheap) satellite internet would be an equalizer for a lot of the world.