Using a TBC for video capture

A Timebase Corrector (TBC) fixes video sync on every scan line of an analog video. Even for good tapes it gives far better video captures.

Most VHS VCRs didn't have a TBC, that's one of the reasons each generation of copy was far worst that the previous one. Broadcast VCRs and S-VHS VCRs usually came with a TBC.

https://peertube.fenarinarsa.com/w/m9kk6ExLwQyJLumBurEQ36

VHS capture - No TBC vs TBC (good quality VHS)

PeerTube
@fenarinarsa one thing to note is that Domesday Duplicator/RF capture bypasses the need for a hardware TBC, as you don't need to worry about stabilizing the output composite/S-Video signal; TBC functionality is instead handled by software 🤯 .
https://github.com/simoninns/DomesdayDuplicator
https://github.com/oyvindln/vhs-decode
#DomesdayDuplicator #vhs #digitization #preservation
GitHub - simoninns/DomesdayDuplicator: High-speed LaserDisc RF sampler

High-speed LaserDisc RF sampler. Contribute to simoninns/DomesdayDuplicator development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub
@jasonnab Yup, but it's a very long process, and quite overkill in most cases imo.
Also it doesn't support SECAM? Anyway. It's good it exists for preservation of very rare tapes I guess.

@fenarinarsa Ah SECAM. I wonder if it's simply a software implementation limitation. I don't think it's an issue for the RF capture, but the decoding indeed is an issue I suppose it sounds like.

It is really just so much more convenient than standard capture for me at least, but yes it's fantastic for preservation overall.

@jasonnab Well I have 220 tapes to capture and convert in 2 months, I'm not sure it would be a lot better with the device. At least I checked the comparison online, I don't see that much a difference, or not a difference that would matter the hassle of buying the device anyway.
But again, it's only for this specific project.