the FDA is considering a ban on menthol cigarette sales

https://lemmy.world/post/6258145

the FDA is considering a ban on menthol cigarette sales - Lemmy.world

If you only ban the menthols, it’s racist. If you ban all cigarettes, it’s health-forward and progressive. Ban all cigs.
Or, how about we let people put whatever they want into their own body?
Because of the children, won’t someone think of the children?!
They already aren’t allowed to smoke!
But parents are allowed to expose them to the smoke.

Do we need to ban everything that a shitty parent might not be able to keep away from their kids?

Why not expand the definition of child abuse to include these things instead of punishing people who are never around kids?

Why not expand the definition of child abuse to include these things instead of punishing people who are never around kids?

That sounds like a great idea, but it’s going to be impossible to enforce.

I’d be with you if second and third hand smoke wasn’t a thing. And also if I didn’t just kick nicotine a month back for causing severe pain in my hands and wrists.
So if some can’t enjoy something responsibly, no one can?
Wtf is 3rd hand smoke?

The theory that when you smoke, the nicotine binds to surfaces the smoke touches, causing cancer to anyone who comes near surfaces that nicotine has touched.

It was a "truth" run around in the 80s as we were discovering the nature of radiation, so lots of war on drug "research" papers got published functionally saying nicotine and radiation are the same thing.

I mean, nicotine does saturate things when you smoke in an enclosed area. It’s impossible to paint over the stained walls of a smoker’s house without chemically stripping them first, because all the accumulated tar will just seep through the paint and leave brown stains. There’s no way that shit’s healthy.

You mistake the word "nicotine" for the word "tar".

2 wildly different concepts.

Are you suggesting that tar doesn’t contain nicotine or other harmful substances found in cigarettes? Because lol.

That’s okay though, I’m sure you are very special and immune to it.

Normally I'd agree, but cigarettes in particular are a product that is designed to be as addictive as possible with a laundry list of negative health impacts and virtually zero positive ones. Combine that with the fact that you aren't just putting it in your body but the body of anyone within breathing distance of you, there's a strong case to be made for banning them outright.

Put it another way, if cigarettes are legal then marijuana, LSD, MDMA, and a whole host of other drugs should be legal too.

Combine that with the fact that you aren’t just putting it in your body but the body of anyone within breathing distance of you,

That’s part of responsible use. I’m ok with only letting smokers smoke in specialty ventilated & filtered areas. Easy for me to say, I don’t smoke. But if anyone wants to make an informed decision to, they should be able to.

Put it another way, if cigarettes are legal then marijuana, LSD, MDMA, and a whole host of other drugs should be legal too.

I emphatically agree.

Put it another way, if cigarettes are legal then marijuana, LSD, MDMA, and a whole host of other drugs should be legal too.

Yes. Yes they should.

Bruh, you know tobacco is a plant. Right?

Alcohol needs so much work to be made.

Tobacco is a plant.

Just like weed.

So's hemlock, what's your point?
That noone "made it" the way it is, and if dudes gonna smoke a plant, let dude smoke a plant.

Cigarettes != tobacco. Tobacco is an ingredient in cigarettes, and not the only one, not by a long shot. Literally dozens of additives are included in cigarettes, many of which are designed to make them more addictive.

Secondly, modern tobacco absolutely was "made" the way it is, first through selective breeding and then genetic modification to (among other things) increase Nicotine content. Much in the same way that modern weed is far stronger than the stuff grown 50 years ago, so too is tobacco.

Tell that to all the smokers trying to quit who wish their younger self had not started in the first place.
Vape for the same effect. I don’t want to choke on what you’re putting in your body.
Ok, I’ll bite. Why is banking only menthols racist?
Because African American smokers tend to favor menthol over other types of cigarettes.
Because it’s doing the most harm to the most harmed demographic?
Black people tend to primarily smoke menthol, disproportionate to other races. I’m too lazy to link, but you can Google it and find studies pretty easily.
It's why this same prohibition measure has failed in many legislative bodies many times.
Banning drugs or alcohol has never worked. The demand will still be there. People will turn to the black market instead if it gets banned.
There is a whole arc in the Battlestar Galactica reboot series that masterfully illustrates this topic.
Yeah, which is why illegal drugs have more users than legal drugs (alcohol and tobacco). Except they don’t.

Their argument was that banning cigarettes wouldn’t eliminate their use, only drive people to continue doing it through other methods.

What does your comment have to do with that…? Nobody said there would somehow be more users than before, just that people would continue doing it…

My argument is that since illegal drugs have significantly fewer users, prohibition does reduce usage.

That logic doesn’t flow, though. You need to compare number of current illegal users vs number of users before it was illegal.

Have you heard of the US prohibition on alcohol? It’s a pretty famous counterexample to your argument showing that it absolutely does not reduce usage.

The same number of people, as a percentage, smoke marijuana as smoke cigarettes. Marijuana use is federally illegal and illegal in most states.

So no, it really doesn’t reduce usage.

I don’t know about the USA, but I see tobacco smokers every day and very rarely see marijuana smokers.
Most people smoking weed aren’t just doing it out in the open like tobacco users
Well, then the prohibition has pretty much fulfilled its purpose.
Well, then the prohibition has pretty much fulfilled its purpose.
When the government makes something illegal, they don’t do it in hopes of millions of people doing it anyways in private.
Maybe not for other laws, but it makes sense for drugs. The important thing is that people should have the right to breathe non-poisonous air, and forcing smokers to hide their smoking achieves that.

This ban is on the sale of menthol infused cigarettes. It wouldn’t criminalize smoking menthols and there’s plenty of other ways to infuse cigarettes with menthol or buy a synthetic alternative.

If your point is at all that this prohibition would in any way, shape, or form help fulfill that goal, that is incorrect.

If you read the comment chain, we’ve been talking about drug prohibition in general, not this specific ban.

I’ve read the comment chain, it just seemed like you were implying that this ban would achieve some kind of beneficial outcome. It wouldn’t.

It’s fine if I’m wrong, that’s okay. That’s not my point. I just think this ban has no positive effects whatsoever and I’m just hoping people realize that if true.

Fuck you.

I spent half my life legally smoking tobacco and illegally smoking weed.

I moved a quarter of a voluntary away for the mental health of legally smoking tobacco and legally smoking weed.

I WILL NOT be dragged back into a life where one of my vices give me crippling fear of imprisonment.

Get off your fucking high horse. Mind your own fucking business. Stop asserting your will over others. Live your own fucking life. Let me live my fucking life.

Seriously.

Stop.

Just stop.

Prohibition is horse shit.

Stop supporting prohibition.

I don’t care what you put in your body.

Legalize everything.

But attach harsh prison sentences for exposing others.

Smoke in your home or your closed vehicle away from children.

Because I’m REAL FUCKING TIRED of walking through a cloud of smoke to enter a building.

Come to Colorado! If it’s worth legalization, we are all about it.

(One of my post-legalization projects…)

Leave it to Lemmyists to downvote a comment saying that you shouldn’t be allowed to force other people to breathe poisonous smoke.
I don’t think this person means criminalize use of cigarettes to be fair.
They’ll criminalize tobacco production and smuggling and there would 100*% be a black market.
Think of it more like a safety standard - prevent the sales of variations doing the most harm to public health
Make me. Preferably after a 2 mile hike 😘
I’m glad I live in a country with universal healthcare. Your point is made completely erroneous by the fact that everyone’s taxes are paying for your cancer treatment. This “fuck you i’ll do what i want” mentality is literally antisocial conservative garbage.

This apparently is an objectionable point to bring up… not sure if your downvotes are the “all or nothing” aspect, or the spotlighting of the blatant racist aspect, but it seems people don’t want to see this at face value :/

I’m with you though. The selective targeting is wrong. Equal ban or no ban is the right position to take IMHO.

And I agree with you. It’s not like I give a shit what anyone does to their own bodies, as long as it doesn’t harm or negatively affect anyone else.
I down voted it because I don’t think the government should ban substances. Not cigarettes, not alcohol, not marijuana, not psychedelics, and probably not a bunch of other drugs too. The government’s job is not to play mommy and daddy for a nation of adults. Our citizens are entirely too eager to strip away their own liberty these days.

I agree with that.

The specific ban in question on this particular post isn’t a general matter though… it’s targeting minorities…

That kinda makes it a moot point in my opinion on wether or not prohibition is appropriate in general, because regardless of where you fall on the matter of bans or liberties, the specificity of the intended targets is wildly inappropriate, because it’s racist/homophobic, so I kinda disregarded the last point they made entirely :)

It aint racist my guy. The chemical processes involved in menthol cigarettes increase the carcinogenic properties of the cig.

Yes, no shit cigs are bad. Menthol cigs are the worst offenders.

Cancer risk no higher with menthol cigarettes, says study

People who smoke menthol cigarettes are no more likely to develop lung cancer than those who smoke non-menthol varieties, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday.

NBC News
Incorrect on both fronts.