@Yoshi i think that panel only really applies if the new technology doesn't add anything new or make any real improvements, and just tries to be "the best" without addressing issues with the existing options
@Yoshi I feel like every new thing was started because of good intention. But inevitably something about it is imperfect, thus warranting a successor. And the cycle repeats.
@fd2@Yoshi then let there be a successor. you're not going to marry the standard anyway, and in most cases you can just build bridges between two standards
@Yoshi this has been true for years. I use to tell my staff when we were designing systems, to pick a standard, any standard, just don't make a new one.