Mastodawn

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

#RightToRepair has no cannier, more dedicated adversary than #apple whose most innovative work is dreaming up new ways to sneakily sabotage repair while claiming to be a caring environmental steward, a lie that covers up the mountains of #ewaste that Apple dooms our descendants to wade through.

--

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/22/vin-locking/#thought-differently

1/

Pluralistic: Apple fucked us on right to repair (again) (22 Sept 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Why does Apple hate repair so much? It's not that they want to poison our water and bodies with microplastics; it's not that they want to hasten the day our coastal cities drown; it's not that they relish the human misery that accompanies every gram of conflict mineral. They aren't sadists. They're merely sociopathically greedy.

2/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

#TimCook laid it out for his investors: when people can repair their devices, they don't buy new ones. When people don't buy new devices, Apple doesn't sell them new devices. It's that's simple:

https://www.inverse.com/article/52189-tim-cook-says-apple-faces-2-key-problems-in-surprising-shareholder-letter

So Apple does everything it can to monopolize repair.

3/

Tim Cook Says Apple Faces 2 Key Problems in Surprising Shareholder Letter

Is there trouble ahead?

Inverse

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

Not just because this lets the company gouge you on routine service, but because it lets them decide when your phone is beyond repair, so they can offer you a trade-in, ensuring both that you buy a new device and that the device you buy is another Apple.

There are so many tactics Apple gets to use to sabotage repair. For example, Apple engraves microscopic Apple logos on the subassemblies in its devices.

4/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

This allows the company to enlist US Customs to seize and destroy refurbished parts that are harvested from dead phones by workers in the Pacific Rim:

https://repair.eu/news/apple-uses-trademark-law-to-strengthen-its-monopoly-on-repair/

Of course, the easiest way to prevent harvested components from entering the parts stream is to destroy as many old devices as possible.

5/

Apple uses trademark law to strengthen its monopoly on repair - Right to Repair Europe

After Henrik Huseby's case, we analyse how Apple monopolises spare parts to decide the price of its repairs and perpetuate a culture of throw-away products.

Right to Repair Europe

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

That's why Apple's so-called "recycling" program *shreds* any devices you turn over to them. When you trade in your old iPhone at an Apple Store, it is converted into immortal e-waste (no other major recycling program does this). The logic is straightforward: no parts, no repairs:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/yp73jw/apple-recycling-iphones-macbooks

6/

Apple Forces Recyclers to Shred All iPhones and MacBooks

Documents obtained by Motherboard: "No reuse. No parts harvesting. No resale."

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

Shredding parts and cooking up bogus trademark claims is just for starters, though. For Apple, the true anti-repair innovation comes from the most pernicious US tech law: #Section1201 of the #DigitalMillenniumCopyrightAct (#DMCA).

#DMCA1201 is an #AntiCircumvention law. It bans the distribution of any tool that bypasses "an effective means of access control."

7/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

That's all very abstract, but here's what it means: if a manufacturer sticks some #DigitalRightsManagement (#DRM) in its device, then anything you want to do that involves removing that DRM is now illegal - even if the thing itself is perfectly legal.

When Congress passed this stupid law in 1998, it had a very limited blast radius. Computers were still pretty expensive and DRM use was limited to a few narrow categories.

8/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

In 1998, DMCA 1201 was mostly used to prevent you from de-regionalizing your DVD player to watch discs that had been released overseas but not in your own country.

But as we warned back then, computers were only going to get smaller and cheaper, and eventually, it would only cost manufacturers pennies to wrap their products - or even subassemblies in their products - in DRM. Congress was putting a gun on the mantelpiece in Act I, and it was bound to go off in Act III.

9/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

Welcome to Act III.

Today, it costs about a quarter to add a #SystemOnAChip to even the tiniest parts. These SOCs can run DRM. Here's how that DRM works: when you put a new part in a device, the SOC and the device's main controller communicate with one another.

10/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

They perform a cryptographic protocol: the part says, "Here's my serial number," and then the main controller prompts the user to enter a manufacturer-supplied secret code, and the master controller sends a signed version of this to the part, and the part and the system then recognize each other.

11/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

This process has many names, but because it was first used in the automotive sector, it's widely known as #VINLocking (#VIN stands for #VehicleIdentificationNumber, the unique number given to every car by its manufacturer). VIN-locking is used to block independent mechanics from repairing your car; even if they use the manufacturer's own parts, the parts and the engine will refuse to work together until the manufacturer's rep keys in the unlock code:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/24/rent-to-pwn/#kitt-is-a-demon

12/

Pluralistic: Autoenshittification (24 July 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

VIN locking is everywhere. It's how #JohnDeere stops farmers from fixing their own tractors - something farmers have done literally since tractors were invented:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/08/about-those-kill-switched-ukrainian-tractors/

13/

About those kill-switched Ukrainian tractors – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

It's in *ventilators*. Like mobile phones, ventilators are a grotesquely monopolized sector, controlled by a single company #Medtronic, whose biggest claim to fame is effecting the world's largest #TaxInversion in order to manufacture the appearance that it is an Irish company and therefore largely untaxable. Medtronic used the resulting windfall to gobble up most of its competitors.

14/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

During lockdown, as hospitals scrambled to keep their desperately needed ventilators running, Medtronic's VIN-locking became a lethal impediment. Med-techs who used donor parts from one ventilator to keep another running - say, transplanting a screen - couldn't get the device to recognize the part because all the world's aircraft were grounded, meaning Medtronic's technicians couldn't swan into their hospitals to type in the unlock code and charge them hundreds of dollars.

15/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

The saving grace was an anonymous, former Medtronic repair tech, who built pirate boxes to generate unlock codes, using any housing they could lay hands on to use as a case: guitar pedals, clock radios, etc. This tech shipped these gadgets around the world, observing strict anonymity, because #Article6 of the #EUCD *also* bans circumvention:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/07/10/flintstone-delano-roosevelt/#medtronic-again

16/

Pluralistic: 10 Jul 2020 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

Of course, *Apple* is a *huge* fan of VIN-locking. In phones, #VIN-locking is usually called #serializing or #PartsPairing, but it's the same thing: a tiny subassembly gets its own microcontroller whose sole purpose is to prevent independent repair technicians from fixing your gadget. Parts-pairing lets Apple block repairs even when the technician uses new, Apple parts - but it also lets Apple block refurb parts and third party parts.

17/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

For many years, Apple was the senior partner and leading voice in blocking state Right to Repair bills, which it killed by the *dozen*, leading a coalition of monopolists, from #Wahl (who boobytrap their hair-clippers with springs that cause their heads irreversibly decompose if you try to sharpen them at home) to John Deere (who reinvented tenant farming by making farmers tenants of their tractors, rather than their land).

18/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

But Apple's opposition to repair eventually became a problem for the company. It's bad optics, and both Apple customers and Apple employees are volubly displeased with the company's ecocidal conduct. But of course, Apple's *management* and *shareholders* hate repair and want to block it as much as possible.

But Apple knows how to Think Differently. It came up with a way to eat its cake and have it, too.

19/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

The company embarked on a program of visibly support right to repair, while working behind the scenes to sabotage it.

Last year, Apple announced a repair program. It was *hilarious*. If you wanted to swap your phone's battery, all you had to do was let Apple put a $1200 hold on your credit card, and then wait while the company shipped you 80 pounds' worth of specialized tools, packed in two special Pelican cases:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/22/apples-cement-overshoes/

20/

Apple’s Cement Overshoes – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

Then, you swapped your battery, but you weren't done! After your battery was installed, you had to conference in an authorized Apple tech who would tell you what code to type into a laptop you tethered to the phone in order to pair it with your phone. Then all you had to do was lug those two 40-pound Pelican cases to a shipping depot and wait for Apple to take the hold off your card (less the $120 in parts and fees).

21/

Cory Doctorow Sep 22, 2023

By contrast, independent repair outfits like @ifixit will sell you all the tools you need to do your own battery swap - including the battery! for $32. The whole kit fits in a padded envelope:

https://www.ifixit.com/products/iphone-x-replacement-battery

But while Apple was able to make a showy announcement of its repair program and then hide the malicious compliance inside those giant Pelican cases, sabotaging right to repair legislation is a lot harder.

22/

iPhone X Battery: Replacement Part / Repair Kit

Replace a 2716 mAh battery compatible with iPhone X. 3.81 Volts (V), 10.35 Watt Hours (Wh). Compatible with all iPhone X models.

@pluralistic no other "ad-hoc" law has ever laid such a solid foundation for the fictional creation of a monopolistic market so heavily concentrated in such a small group of corporations. The #DMCA is, without a doubt, the most extreme legal expression of an anti competitive market ever passed.
Understanding that the #DMCA is the most harmful piece of legislation ever passed against consumers and free and competitive market as a whole is paramount.

Chancerubbage Sep 22, 2023

@pluralistic some of the telcos and secondary brick and mortar resellers might allow refurb parts back in as part of their ‘warranty’ repair strategy. And I’m fairly sure Apple refurbs their trade ins as well. Sometime the customer is happy to be offered a new shiny however, or a rebuild- most cannot afford to go WITHOUT.