idle thought, Deleuzean Virtuality seems to resemble Juarrero's Multiple Realizability in explanatory power and the abstract-instance relation (diverse lineages of "real"ity aside)

@junosz

oh no please do not add another one, please no J!

IMHO AFAIK J's Multiple Realizability better fits into:

L. Pessoa et al.
#Overlapping

GM Edelman et al.
#degeneracy
#redundancy

Michael L Anderson et al. #NeuralReuse

D Hebb et al.
#NeuronalEnsemble

see:
https://mastodon.online/@Neurograce/110697810878967152

Grace Lindsay (@[email protected])

What are the foundational principles of #neuroscience? By which I mean: beliefs or assumptions that animate our study of the brain across topics. Things like a belief in a structure-function relationship or the neuron as the base unit.

Mastodon
@teixi thanks for the pointers- I'm thinking about it in the field of general philosophy rather than specificly phil.neuro- specifically, trying to reconcile a process view (a la whitehead) with a more traditional analytic merological / kantian view of wholes-parts and types-tokens. I think my schema is still inperfect, and I'm still trying to understand the subtle implications- certainly not advocating more or different views for practicioners (yet!).