@avakining @gknauss that is very very fair!
I think there are two types of OSS project: Those that people build for themselves, and then put on the Internet, just to be nice, and those that are clearly trying to amass as many users as possible.
I probably have different expectations for one versus the other.
@cferdinandi @avakining @gknauss
I think it may be possible there is a third type: people that are trying to help out a community with useful software or whatever, without trying to turn it into a "how many users can I get" job.
They are still interested in people being able to use it without having a post-grad degree in compiling random coders mess from github.
@BoscoZebra @avakining @gknauss That's still the first type, IMO.
Don't get me wrong—most tech docs suck! I just don't think complaining about free software from people is the look.
@cferdinandi @avakining @gknauss
That's fair, complaining is probably the entirely wrong approach.
I also think it's fair if someone says "this code will do X, here's how you assemble it and those instructions are unclear or wrong, it's not unreasonable to reach out and say "Hey man, documentation says to do X, I did it, this is what is happening, how do I fix that"
I also largely ignore social media/comments, so I may be missing some important context, are the comments awful?