i saw a discussion on cohost a while back in which folks w/ eating disorders were talking about how content warnings on websites for posts involving food actually exacerbate their issues because it frames "food" as something that needs "a warning" and i'm interested in seeing perspectives on here about this. 
i have an eating disorder and food CW is helpful to me
6.9%
i have an eating disorder and food CW is neutral to me
8.5%
i have an eating disorder and food CW is harmful to me
3.5%
i don't have an eating disorder
63.2%
i don't have an eating disorder but food CW is still helpful to me
17.9%
Poll ended at .

@goaty A year or so ago, my country passed a new law that requires proccessed food's packaging the inclusion of visible warnings on their products if needed.

Later on, some products marketted as 'healthy' or similar, ended up having a few warnings.

I personally think it's important so we have clear information on what we are consuming, given it's well implemented and enforced. Granted that diets vary from person to person, but baseline information is always useful.

My 2 cents, on this.

@rayko i agree but i think you may have misunderstood what i'm referring to? i mean like, using the "content warning" function on mastodon for posts involving food
@goaty Ignore me them xD
@rayko all good :D i updated the post to make that a bit clearer, cause i can get how without context it reads like it'd be about that!