GitHub is "The AI-powered developer platform".

Not the "Build software better, together. Powerful collaboration, code review, and code management for open source and private projects." we signed up for years ago. (github's main page from webarchive).

@fedor I'm so glad that I'm migrating to codeberg (for FOSS) and sourcehut (anything else).
@Andre_LA @fedor Why not FOSS on SourceHut?

@mcepl
@fedor

The last time I saw, codeberg seems easier for contribution.

Short GitHub patch workflow demo

PeerTube

@mcepl @Andre_LA correct comparison would be with this process: https://spacepub.space/w/9Dfeq3fBXABUQPY8XR4RgU

I for sure can see how github-like workflow could be considered easier.

Live stream archive: reviewing patches by email

PeerTube

@fedor @mcepl

Got the first video working, just watched now, pretty nice, I did a check, and fortunately codeberg doesn't hides the .patch (although not that visible either).

On a pull request, you go on the changed files, and on the options dropdown there's the button to download the patch.

Or just add ".patch" at the end of the URL of the PR.

Anyway, I appreciate codeberg's way, even GH-like can be hard to learn for who is just starting, but it doesn't hides the patch file as GH does.