How long before they start proposing to build a wall around the state and make the neighboring states pay for it?
🤔...
@Stacky @Blort @georgetakei The question is only how high the fence.
And there are innocents hostages inside.
And to take another page from the good old times of the Cold War, perhaps a nice minefield around Texas too, to make sure no one tries to pass the state line outside the office border stations along the interstates.
@Blort @georgetakei You mean like with the Texas electricity grid.
Where the Texas consumer end up holding the bag, because GOP cannot accept Federal regulations, thus refuses to interconnect with the US backbone grids.
Hence Texas has a much higher tendency to blackouts in extreme weather, plus extreme pricing during such events.
I'm sure the idea initially was to make DC surrender, on the regulation, but it is what it is.
What was originally built as a barrier to entry can just as quickly become a means of preventing exit, making those inside prisoners.
@Steve
Interstate commerce comes to mind.
@Steve @georgetakei I'm not a lawyer, I don't know how this really goes.
But if you told me a Texas court found a formerly-pregnant person guilty of the crime of pregnancy termination on the basis of circumstantial evidence alone, I would not be surprised at all.
In any case, the threat of getting dragged into court and turning a quiet, private decision into a public show is coercive in and of itself, whether the state is likely to prevail in such a case or not.
You might already know this, but: Sheriffs are not mentioned in the constitution, directly or indirectly.
@georgetakei I guess no one there has bothered to read Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
This Supreme Court decision forbade states from enacting any legislation that would interfere with Congress's right to regulate commerce among the separate states.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/gibbons-v-ogden
EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Decree in Gibbons v. Ogden; 3/2/1824; Engrossed Minutes, 2/1790 - 6/7/1954; Records of the Supreme Court of the United States, Record Group 267; National Archives Building, Washington, DC. View All Pages on DocsTeach View Transcript This Supreme Court decision forbade states from enacting any legislation that would interfere with Congress's right to regulate commerce among the separate states.
@georgetakei
I've always expected the worst from those folks.
Doesn't this stuff fall afoul of the interstate commerce clause?
omg it's a cohesive list of my high school reading curriculum 😢 That's horrifying
@georgetakei I think I'm going to ask this again, seriously this time.
What happens if you drive someone right up to the border, stop, the person gets out and walks for half a mile, then you just happen to drive by and pick that person up again?
The GOP's anti-reproductive rights laws target black and hispanic women the most.
Republican billionaire donors know that black and brown women don't vote GOP & there's nothing like an unplanned pregnancy to derail a woman's life.
So much of their behavior is reminiscent of the Fugitive Slave Acts.
Republican billionaire donors want to repeal the 19th and thwart the passage of the ERA.
Jesus Christ what a shithole country.
Texas is going fully Fascist. Get out while you can!