Antik 👾Yes but when people start creating account to post CSAM it doesn’t leave us much choice does it.
MachefiSeems like a pretty important detail. Why didn’t you mention it in the body?
It’s really not that hard to connect the dots… Unless you’re trying to impose a situation
It’s about transparency for me. The admins claim to care about it and users praise them for it, but to me it seems like they’re doing the bare minimum informing us about changes we are about to notice. Reminds me of corporations writing statements trying to sweep things under the carpet. You and I might realise what it’s all about, but many users without the context won’t.
That’s not what I want Lemmy to be. I want to feel included as a part of the community. I’m doing what I think I can to help it all go in the right direction
Understand the issue with transparency. It’s just a very sensitive topic all around. And it sucks it is happening. I am not realizing as well a very important threat that exists in unmoderated federation.
Doing “the bare minimum”? We have quite a big team trying to keep the impact for our users to a minimum. We don’t claim to care. We DO care. And we try to be as transparant as possible.
We monitor the new posts, we react very quickly to reports, we make sure that even with the sign up requirements everyone can still get on board quickly and we are looking for a solution for the csam problem.
If this is not what you want Lemmy to be, there are plenty of options.
I’m only talking about transparency here, didn’t mean to undermine other moderation efforts and sorry if I phrased it ambiguously. But regarding informing users, yes, I think Lemmy.world admins do the minimum