@lostintech So, Creality still violating open source licenses.
Qidi didn't do a perfect job of how they released the sources but at least they appear to have done so on a timely basis.
I ordered the Qidi X-Max3 instead of the K1 Max, and Qidi honoring the open source license terms was a major factor in this decision. Ordering the Creality would be a slap in the face to everyone who has contributed to all the software Creality are currently using in violation of license terms.
@mcdanlj @lostintech I was critical of qidi and their lack of source nor root on the SBC, but I understand those are resolved?
The K1 Max is appealing, but I’d yeah, that OSS compliance is a no-go. I’m actually curious if -any- 3d printing manufacturer has an OSPO (or really anyone looking after open source concerns). I kind of doubt it.
@lostintech @mcdanlj so, I think there is a massive misunderstanding of what is going on here.
In your video you say “it’s also still closed source although creality is going to be releasing the code soon.”
No, it’s not closed source.
It’s open source software (Klipper), Creality is not following the license of that software. You can’t just do this when you get around to it.
It’s like taking a piece of candy from a store and saying you’ll pay later.
@linux_mclinuxface @lostintech @mcdanlj
It’s probably worth noting that Creality had an AMA about 10 days ago to talk about their intentions and what they plan to release. Not that it was marketed enough for awareness, but it’s something. https://old.reddit.com/r/Creality_3D_Official/comments/15o7h1o/ama_i_am_ralf_luo_the_rd_director_from_creality/
@lostintech @linux_mclinuxface @mcdanlj
Sam Prentice is over there right now and there were…some hints about something to that effect on his stream at Creality HQ. My take is it’s a separate printer they’re working on, but someone in the K1 FB group is currently getting a 3D Chameleon a shot since there are now fittting brackets for it. Not that I have any clue how that’ll look/work/compromise the closed chamber.