India just landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independent
India just landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independent
Cool.
The average income in India is 25x ish less than that of the US. If we scale the $75 million cost to land on the moon by 25 times, we get $1.8 billion. The Perseverance rover’s cost is estimated at $2.75 billion and that thing landed on Mars.
It’s incredibly impressive that India has landed on the moon on their 2nd try. Nothing should take away from that, and India should be very proud of their achievement. But geez this is a braindead article. Yes, poorer countries can pay people less do the same amount of work as someone in another country.
The difference in income is by about 9-10 time. Salary for a NASA scientist can go in the range of ₹1 to 2 crores (converted from dollar to rupees). For a ISRO scientist however, they may earn in ₹10-15 lakhs.
I’ve made a comment explaining why the mission was so cost-effective just below this comment you’ve posted on.
Astronauts get the headlines, but they couldn't go into space without the work of NASA's scientists who do the research and compile the data that's used during missions. Getting hired at NASA is competitive, so make sure you have the education, skills and experience that set you apart.