This is some cool research, but I also fundamentally think we should be encouraging people NOT to use #TextGenerators as search.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7100577024452300800/
This is some cool research, but I also fundamentally think we should be encouraging people NOT to use #TextGenerators as search.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7100577024452300800/
Text generators generate text.
They were not designed to search, and until they are built to do that, I think it’s super irresponsible to act otherwise.
I think that calling them "text generators" instead of "LLMs" or "GPTs" can help to clarify what they were designed to do.
I can't say for sure, but I actually think that if we called these things "text generators," we wouldn't even need a word for the misleadingly named "hallucinations" of these systems.
These tools weren't designed to be be truthful or factual, of course. They were designed to generate text.
A text generator generating text isn't a hallucination, it's just doing the thing it was built to do.
I am honestly excited about what AI tools could enable. Even just narrowing to text generators, I think there's going to be a ton of awesome creative stuff people figure out how to do leveraging these tools.
But they are tools.
And they were made by people to do a particular thing. That thing can be really impressive!
But it isn't search.
https://mastodon.publicinterest.town/@b_cavello/110195030804262597
Attached: 1 image How I’ve been feeling about all these #GPT for search updates 🥴
Another way to #TalkBetterAboutAI is to try to avoid personifying language. This is TOUGH. Personifying stuff is so useful for explaining things. It's really hard to avoid, and often explaining things more accurately can take a couple more words. It is tough. But I think it's worth it, too. By talking about these tools as tools, it helps us recognize both our own agency and impact as users of the tools, but it also can help clarify the role of the people who created these tools.
Thanks, @b_cavello ! Have you see this paper, specifically on why LLMs are not a match for search?
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3498366.3505816
Related op-ed:
https://iai.tv/articles/all-knowing-machines-are-a-fantasy-auid-2334
@b_cavello Checking; every single one of those generated responses appears to be wrong: https://www.dhs.state.il.us/page.aspx?item=15070
Or at least outdated; depending on if a given generator is simply duplicating old scraped text verbatim or not.