Reading the indictment, I'd say this aged pretty well https://twitter.com/reedmideke/status/1446275266515406884
Reed Mideke on Twitter

“Important point. It looked like throwing random 💩at the wall hoping something would stick, but pieces actually go together: 1) DOJ claims fraud in states 2) States send competing electors 3) Pence does Eastman script https://t.co/HyoQ94CsOm”

Twitter
Anyway, since it's going to trial, this will be the continuation of the long-running "Donnie tries a coup" thread, which started with another reasonably well aged tweet https://twitter.com/reedmideke/status/1324521933262581760
Reed Mideke on Twitter

“I think we know… it depends on what the people around him signal they would go along with and how the people who would implement it respond”

Twitter

Reuters reports polling showing, if convicted of felonies "45% [of GOP] said they would not vote for him, more than the 35% who said they would. The rest said they didn't know"
On the one hand, the 35% is pretty depressing and could be expected to grow significantly assuming right wing media and electeds keep calling it a witch hunt. OTOH, even 10% ditching him would be catastrophic for his reelection chances

https://www.reuters.com/legal/about-half-us-republicans-could-spurn-trump-if-he-is-convicted-reutersipsos-poll-2023-08-03/

About half of US Republicans could spurn Trump if he is convicted, Reuters/Ipsos poll shows

About half of Republicans would not vote for Donald Trump if he were convicted of a felony, a sign of the severe risks his legal problems pose for his 2024 U.S. presidential bid, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Thursday.

Reuters

They also find "Asked if they would vote for Trump if he were "currently serving time in prison," 52% of Republicans said they would not, compared to 28% who said they would." so, yeah… lock him up

In any case, makes it pretty clear why he wants to delay trials

If you're seeing sensational takes about the #ProtectiveOrder and the "COMING AFTER YOU" post, here's a thread that's not that

Not gonna screenshot the whole thread of screenshots of filing, but (IANAL) tl;dr seems to be this was a pretty normal filing in a pretty normal protective order process that would happen anyway, and they threw the post in there as an example of his habit of posting (and probably a cheeky way to get it on the record)

https://twitter.com/openargs/status/1687650475171348480

Opening Arguments on Twitter

“🚨DOJ HAS **NOT** SOUGHT SANCTIONS OVER TRUMP'S "I'M COMING AFTER YOU" POST The DOJ has used Trump's Truth Social burp as support for its pre-existing argument in favor of a more restrictive protective order, NOT for sanctions. /1 https://t.co/J1ULxdgM6i”

Twitter
Kind of minor in the grand scheme of things, but this has been bugging me since the 1/6 #TrumpIndictment came out "no election challenges remained in New Mexico on Dec. 14, 2020, but the campaign filed a new lawsuit at 11:54 a.m., six minutes before the noon deadline for the electors to vote, presumably to give the Trump electors a rationale for meeting" https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/07/fake-electors-trump-indictment/
‘Fake’ elector plot raised concerns over legal peril, indictment shows

There were doubts about alternate electors across seven states and within the Donald Trump campaign.

The Washington Post
Filing a frivolous lawsuit just so you can say you had active litigation at the time seems like something courts and state bars should frown on. Lawsuit appears to be https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18740703/donald-j-trump-for-president-inc-v-toulouse-oliver/
Donald J. Trump for President, Inc v. Toulouse Oliver, 1:20-cv-01289 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc v. Toulouse Oliver, 1:20-cv-01289 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

CourtListener
Apparently, there were bar complaints (unfortunately, links to actual complaint are broken) https://abq.news/stories/nm-attorneys-file-ethics-complaint-against-two-trump-lawyers-who-sought-to-dismiss-2020-election,8023
NM Attorneys File Ethics Complaint Against Two Trump Lawyers Who Sought to Dismiss 2020 Election Certification

A group of New Mexico attorneys has re-filed an ethics complaint with the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of New Mexico asking it to investigate and discipline attorneys Mark J. Caruso and …

The Paper
Add Craig D. Robertson to the list of people who got themselves killed directly due to believing Trump's bullshit https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/09/politics/fbi-utah-man-joe-biden/index.html
Extremely gratifying to see the attacks on Ruby Freeman charged

I wondered how the Freeman thing was tied to rest of the conspiracy, since Floyd and Kutti didn't seem like core Trump world people, but Act 127 connects them with Robert Cheeley (Trump lawyer) and Scott Hall (involved in coffee county voting machines)

@Pwnallthethings write up has a very helpful who's who
https://www.pwnallthethings.com/p/the-georgia-indictment

The Georgia Indictment

A quick summary

PwnAllTheThings
Also just want to note that in addition to facing various sanctions and bar discipline in multiple jurisdictions, the entire "Elite Strike Force" has now been indicted
Look Donny, I know some of your killjoy lawyers are probably trying to talk you out of it, but "the election was stolen, actually" is an *amazing* defense and you should definitely run with that… https://mastodon.social/@w7voa@journa.host/110894023788245858
Hunter Walker has some deep reporting on TPM about the Freeman episode. Turns out Kutti and Floyd were both pretty directly hooked into Trump world as well. Plus a cameos by Mike Lindell and a Trumpy Canadian weed startup
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trevian-kutti-harrison-floyd-steve-lee-fani-willis
The Full Story Behind The Bizarre Election Episode That Led To Charges In Trump’s Latest Indictment

TPM has extensive new reporting on the alleged harassment of Ruby Freeman detailing how the key players in the scheme were linked to President Trump.

TPM – Talking Points Memo

"Trump supporters post names and addresses of Georgia grand jurors online"
Who could have predicted ? (me, for one https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/110891481232943798)
Also going to hang over trial jurors that they'll be targets for life if they convict

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/names-addresses-grand-jurors-georgia-trump-indictment-posted-online-rcna100239

Trump supporters post names and addresses of Georgia grand jurors online

The purported names and addresses of members of the Georgia grand jury that indicted Donald Trump have been posted online, along with other threats.

NBC News
As predicted, killjoy lawyers are at work trying to dissuade Donald from his "election was stolen, actually" media defense 🍿 (unlike Donald, they probably recognize that Fani Willis will be perfectly happy to have even more obvious lies on the record) https://abcnews.go.com/US/trumps-legal-advisers-urge-cancel-press-conference-refute/story
One reason I suspect prosecutors and judges are going to be fairly laid back about Trump's trash talk: A bunch of his followers will be threats no matter what he says, so him ranting generally about how terrible he thinks a judge is doesn't change the security situation much https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/woman-arrested-allegedly-threatening-federal-judge-trump-election-case-rcna100320
Woman arrested for allegedly threatening federal judge in Trump election case

A Texas woman was arrested for allegedly threatening U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in former President Donald Trump’s election case in Washington, D.C.

NBC News
Same for high profile, public figure witnesses like Pence. Trump's fans already rioted to chants of "hang Mike Pence" so additional ranting about Pence probably isn't gonna move the needle that much for the fans or Pence himself
Doesn't mean he won't eventually cross a line, suspect attacks on jurors or witnesses who aren't high profile political figures will get a swift reaction. But unless it's really blatant, IMO there will be escalating warnings, and if/when he finally does go too far, they'll have a mile of receipts on the record
To be clear, this is all minimally-informed speculation / prediction on my part, put up to age for later evaluation
Boo, killjoy lawyers have won this round, though apparently at the expense of promising to put his "irrefutable" election fraud proof in court filings
(spoiler alert: it ain't and they won't)
https://twitter.com/GarrettHaake/status/1692328029840617515
Garrett Haake on Twitter

“Trump says, on the advice of his lawyers, his “irrefutable” Georgia election fraud report will be put with a future legal filing, so he’s canceling the news conference he had planned at Bedminster on Monday to unveil it. Allies & attorneys had been uneasy about this event”

Twitter

Hugo Lowell reports "per ppl familiar, both lawyers and advisers balked — lawyers bc it would cause problems in court, aides bc it was an idea solo pitched to him by a comms person"

Wonder what the "proof" is, some Mike Lindell hallucination?

https://twitter.com/hugolowell/status/1692329936969765177

Hugo Lowell on Twitter

“New: Trump says Bedminster event to show supposed election fraud in GA is cancelled bc it will be in legal filings. But per ppl familiar, both lawyers and advisers balked — lawyers bc it would cause problems in court, aides bc it was an idea solo pitched to him by a comms person.”

Twitter
Georgia-indicted Trump attorney Kenneth Chesebro "followed Alex Jones around Capitol grounds on January 6th" https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/18/politics/kfile-kenneth-chesebro-followed-alex-jones-capitol-riot-jan-6/index.html

Ryan Goodman points out that Trump's Georgia bail order (https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23921620/23sc188947-consent-order.pdf)
1) Is very specific about potential witness intimidation
2) Is tailored specifically for him, since Eastman's has much more generic language

https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1693715034977759352

#5 also seems potentially risky for Trump. Are social media posts or campaign rally rants about the the facts of the case indirect communications?
Good news / bad news, John Eastman edition:
Good news: Judge in his CA bar discipline proceeding is very accommodating of his schedule
Bad news: He needs the accommodation to surrender on felony charges in GA relating to the same conduct as the bar discipline
https://twitter.com/meghanncuniff/status/1693774530744103031
Meghann Cuniff on X

John Eastman’s a busy guy, with both his state bar hearing in LA and his surrender on his Georgia criminal indictment scheduled this week. Fortunately for him, Judge Roland is accommodating. No hearing tomorrow or Wednesday so he can surrender in Georgia. Back in LA Thursday.

Twitter

Gotta be a fake posted by some hashtag resistance grifter right? I mean, kinda weird Ben of all people would fall for that but…

nope. It's real.

https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1693809658341777668

Ben Collins on X

Honestly not even sure what he's going for here.

Twitter

Incidentally while confirming that post is real, I noticed the first google result that links to truth social is not the home page, it's his profile

Unclear whether intended or merely a side effect of that being by far the most linked page

CREW #FOIA'd Secret Service emails showing chummy communication's with Oath Keepers founder (and convicted 1/6 seditionist) Stewart Rhodes https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/emails-reveal-secret-service-contacts-with-oath-keepers/
Emails reveal Secret Service contacts with Oath Keepers - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

The internal emails show special agents in close communication with Oath Keepers leader Steward Rhodes.

CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
We may recall the Jan 6 committee discovered that USSS "accidentally" wiped a bunch of agents phones as part of a "planned upgrade" right around the transition https://twitter.com/reedmideke/status/1549532261397061632
Reed Mideke on X

Evan leaving aside J6, a planned upgrade that coincided with a change of administration and created an opportunity to "accidentally" lose records seems sus https://t.co/STI4dupgtI

Twitter

In other news, Fani Willis ain't havin of any of Jeffery Clark's bullshit
"As inconvenient as modern air travel can admittedly be, whatever nuisance involved in the defendant securing a flight to Atlanta within the window provided is self-evidently insufficient justification to invoke this Court’s authority to enjoin a State felony criminal prosecution"

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23925189-ndga_1_23-cv-03721-scj_8_0

DocumentCloud

Both Clark and Meadows get a big ol NOPE in their attempt to get a federal court to block their Georgia arrests https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/23/georgia-trump-racketeering-case-state-court-00112480
Federal judge rejects bids to halt Georgia prosecution of Trump aides over 2020 election

Mark Meadows and Jeffrey Clark had both pleaded with the judge to prohibit District Attorney Fani Willis from arresting them by a Friday deadline.

POLITICO
Turns out Harrison Floyd (of the Ruby Freeman saga) was charged with assaulting FBI agents who attempted to serve him a grand jury subpoena #GiftArticle https://wapo.st/3KS7Uc4
Defendant in Trump Georgia case was earlier charged with attacking FBI agent

Harrison William Prescott Floyd is accused of assaulting an agent serving him a subpoena in the Justice Deptartment’s probe of efforts to obstruct the 2020 election.

The Washington Post
United States v. Floyd, III, 8:23-mj-01217 - CourtListener.com

Docket for United States v. Floyd, III, 8:23-mj-01217 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

CourtListener
@emptywheel wrote up Harrison (Willie) Floyd's weirdly inactive assaulting the FBI case. He has since been booked in Georgia and reportedly did not make bail (https://twitter.com/Phil_Lewis_/status/1694793111715860829) https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/08/24/willie-floyds-curiously-inactive-docket/
philip lewis on X

The booking photo for Harrison Floyd, the leader of Black Voices for Trump. He is the only defendant without a bond agreement, so he is still in custody

Twitter
Meanwhile, AJC confirms "Trump is working with a local bonding company to cover his $200,000 bail" … leaving us with a non-zero chance some local bondsman will hunt FPOTUS down if he breaches the terms
https://twitter.com/TamarHallerman/status/1694840991277080909
Tamar Hallerman on X

Confirming CNN's reporting that Trump is working with a local bonding company to cover his $200,000 bail. Charles Shaw, the CEO of Lawrenceville-based Foster Bail Bonds LLC, said he'll be posting Trump's bail https://t.co/07TFuqOuSc

X (formerly Twitter)
Everyone deserves access to competent legal counsel but, also, LOL "A legal-defense fund set up by friends to raise $5 million for [Giuliani] in 2021 took down its website after raising less than $10,000" https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/19/us/politics/giuliani-trump-legal-finances.html
Giuliani Repeatedly Sought Help With Legal Bills From Trump

As Rudolph Giuliani has neared a financial breaking point with a pile of legal bills, the former president has largely demurred, despite making a vague promise to pay up.

The New York Times

Floyd says he's "already here on federal pretrial supervision" implying his stalled assaulting the FBI case is still unresolved. Also uh "Speaking to the judge without representation" seems like a poor plan but maybe consistent with his response to the FBI agents

https://www.11alive.com/amp/article/news/special-reports/ga-trump-investigation/harrison-floyd-georgia-2020-election-rico-case-bond/85-a4a4a305-43cd-4446-9526-7e483e3a13c2

"Floyd said he had requested a public defender and was denied… The judge informed him he could hire legal representation if he doesn't qualify for a public defender … Floyd said he believed it would cost him tens of thousands … he could not afford to go into such debt as he takes care of his daughter"
No idea what his situations is, but this is a real problem… people who will inevitably need assistance have to go completely broke to qualify for it, and end up needing even more assistance
John Eastman's bid to delay his CA bar proceeding due to being named as an unindicted conspirator in DC and indicted in Georgia is denied https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23927615-sbc-23-o-30029-ruling-on-motion-denied
DocumentCloud

Shade: "Given his standing as an attorney and constitutional scholar, his prior deposition before the January 6 Committee, and his appearance before the Fulton County grand jury, it is clear that Respondent is acquainted with exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege. Nevertheless, he chose to go ahead with the trial in this instance without utilizing those rights or pursuing a delay in the proceedings"

10/10 parenthetical
"Trump vows to appeal his [Federal Jan 6] trial date. (It is not appealable) and once against attacked Judge Chutkan"

https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1696232587503550941

Trump's lawyers: Trials should be delayed until after the campaign, let the people decide!
Also Trump's lawyers: "This man’s liberty and life is at stake … He’s no different than any American"
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/28/trump-trial-date-election-subversion-2020-00113186
Trump’s federal trial for subverting election is scheduled for March

“Mr. Trump, like any defendant, will have to make the trial date work regardless of his schedule," the judge said as she set the trial for March 4, one day before Super Tuesday.

POLITICO

Chutkan grants them the latter point, though perhaps not in the way they wanted:
"She compared him to a professional athlete facing criminal charges, saying it would be “inappropriate” to schedule a trial around that athlete’s schedule."

“Setting a trial date does not depend and should not depend on the defendant’s personal and professional obligations … Mr. Trump, like any defendant, will have to make the trial date work regardless of his schedule.”

Harrison Floyd makes bail. Seems his problem was basically down to failing to navigate the bureaucracy, illustrating
1) the shittiness of the system
2) if you're indicted for multiple felonies, at least talk to a lawyer before walking into the jail to surrender https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/29/floyd-trump-georgia-election-charges/
Trump co-defendant reaches bond agreement after weekend in jail

Harrison William Prescott Floyd, who faces allegations that he harassed an Atlanta-area election worker in the weeks following the 2020 presidential election, posted bond of $100,000 Tuesday.

The Washington Post

In the Freeman / Moss civil case, Rudy #Giuliani joins Alex Jones in the exclusive club of people who obstructed discovery blatantly enough to lose a defamation suit by default judgement

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/30/judge-rules-giuliani-is-liable-for-defaming-georgia-election-workers-orders-sanctions-00113462

Rudy Giuliani is liable for defaming Georgia election workers, judge rules

The case will now head to trial, where a jury will determine the amount of damages that Giuliani must pay to the two election workers.

POLITICO
Most default judgements go to people who just don't show up. Jones managing the level fuckupery required despite having tons of money and real lawyers is perhaps unsurprising, but one might expect Giuliani, whose career included being the 3rd most senior person in DOJ and US attorney for SDNY, to do better…
A fact not lost on Judge Howell: "The fact that Giuliani is a sophisticated litigant with a self-professed 50 years of experience in litigation — including serving as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York — only underscores his lackluster preservation efforts"
Also, TFW you're dumber than OANN: "One America’s owners settled with the two women last year for an unspecified amount, but the litigation has continued against Giuliani"
One thing that strikes me in this excellent report on Meadows Georgia hearing from Anna Bower: Meadows reportedly insists the infamous Georgia call was intended to “get things off the president’s plate” so the administration could focus on the “peaceful transfer of power” ahead of Jan. 6
… is ANYONE buying that?
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/mark-meadows-takes-the-stand
Mark Meadows Takes the Stand

A dispatch from the former White House chief of staff’s removal hearing in Atlanta.

Default
I mean, the Trump team infamously obstructed the transition process, to a degree not seen in any modern administration, and it's not like any sane person thought the outcome actually hinged on Georgia by Jan 2
Add Willis' team to the list of those not buying Meadows "I was just trying to facilitate a peaceful transfer of power" line: "The defendant also repeatedly insisted he was merely “trying to land the plane” and achieve “a peaceful transition of power,” a statement clearly belied by his participation in the Trump campaign’s attempts to overturn the outcome of Georgia’s election" https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67694389/the-state-of-georgia-v-meadows/#entry-66
The State of Georgia v. Meadows, 1:23-cv-03621 - CourtListener.com

Docket for The State of Georgia v. Meadows, 1:23-cv-03621 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

CourtListener