Russia's Luna-25 spacecraft has crashed into the Moon, Roscosmos says

https://sh.itjust.works/post/3267516

Russia's Luna-25 spacecraft has crashed into the Moon, Roscosmos says - sh.itjust.works

I’m disappointed with russia. They could have spun it into a successful drone attack on Ukrainian military moon base, or military moon kindergarten.
This is the type of dark joke I needed today. Thanks bud : D

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Roscosmos said it lost contact with the spacecraft on Saturday after it ran into trouble while preparing for its pre-landing orbit of the Moon.

Russia’s robot lander the Luna-25 spacecraft crashed into the moon after it had spun into uncontrolled orbit, the country’s space agency Roscosmos reported on Sunday.

“The apparatus moved into an unpredictable orbit and ceased to exist as a result of a collision with the surface of the Moon,” read a statement from the agency.

Roscosmos said it lost contact with the spacecraft on Saturday after it ran into trouble while preparing for its pre-landing orbit after reporting an “abnormal situation” that its specialists were analysing.

“During the operation, an abnormal situation occurred on board the automatic station, which did not allow the manoeuvre to be performed with the specified parameters,” Roscosmos said in a Telegram post.

The lunar south pole is of particular interest to scientists, who believe the permanently shadowed polar craters may contain water.

The original article contains 246 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 35%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

GitHub - RikudouSage/LemmyAutoTldrBot

Contribute to RikudouSage/LemmyAutoTldrBot development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub
Really fitting news for sh.itjust.works

I’m very conflicted by this.

On one hand it’s sad that so much time and effort has been destroyed. That the hopes and pride of so many well-meaning Russian scientists has been dashed. That the science lost.

On the other hand, Russia launched this thing during their invasion of, and war against, tbe Ukraine in order to demonstrate that they’re big enough and smart enough to do two things at once. To claw back some of the respect that has been lost by not having taken the Ukraine in three days…

Sigh.

It’s just Ukraine. No “the” is needed.
In fact, the 'the' should be removed as it is an intentional way of delegitimizing Ukraine as a separate country. Regional phrasing thing apparently.
I heard the word ukraine used to mean like wastelands or swamplands or something like that. And all the Russians would call it that as an insult when it wasn’t an independent nation yet. So when they did become one, the kept the name but dropped the the. So, Ukraine is a prideful name for a strong country. The Ukraine is an insult.

That’s not the issue.

The issue is that, in English, the Soviet republic was called “The Ukraine” back in Soviet days. “The Ukraine” sounds like a region of a larger country. Whereas the proper name for the country is simply “Ukraine.”

“The Ukraine” is perceived as de-legitimizing Ukraine’s claim of national sovereignty. The U.S. Embassador to Ukraine says so himself.

More info:

washingtonpost.com/…/ukraine-or-the-ukraine-its-m…

‘Ukraine’ or ‘the Ukraine’? It’s more controversial than you think.

Why three tiny letters can make a Ukrainian very upset.

The Washington Post

"Historically, the name Ukraine is thought to have derived from a Russian word that roughly means “borderlands” or “on the border,”

From your article my dude

Did you read the article you’re quoting back at me? That’s the origins of the name, but the issue with “the Ukraine” is explained clearly and corroborates what I’m saying.

Ukrainians still use the word “Україна,” which is pronounced nearly the same in Russia, to name their country. So their issue isn’t that it’s a word that’s derived from “borderlands.”

So because you’re right, I’m not allowed to be right at all? I never said my reason was the sole reason. I brought up a single point, and your article backed me up.

You may be more right, but I’m not wrong

tbf they wrote tbe
It’s just Ukraine. No “tbe” is needed.
It’s also Netherlands. Not the Netherlands.
I’m from ‘The’ United Kingdom, but we may as well de-legitemize our claim to anything these days…
Space is hard. Landing on the pole is especially hard. But, it is somewhat symbolic of Russia’s economy and government
Well, technically, it landed..
Lithobraking success
Although Russia can go kick rocks and gargle some deseased old mans balls for invading Ukraine, it still sucks that they crashed the lander. On the other hand, I kinda hope for some sort of new space race where hopefully something good comes around, not just the old nukes-in-space shit…
Welp, India is was just a tiny bit behind Russia. Their Chandrayaa-3 is set to land on Moon’s south pole in less than 3 days.
In other news, the director of the Luna-25 mission has also had a fatal encounter with gravity.

“The apparatus moved into an unpredictable orbit and ceased to exist as a result of a collision with the surface of the Moon,” read a statement from the agency.

  • ffs that’s a really wordy way of saying “it crashed.”

  • “ceased to exist” - No, it still exists, just in more pieces than when it left the earth, and in a much larger area than originally intended. Still exists, though.

  • On one hand, landing a spacecraft remotely is hard at the best of times. On the other hand, going by what we’ve seen of the state of the Russian military, I’d put money on someone involved in the project having replaced some expensive components/materials with junk, pocketed the saving and put it into real estate abroad. Spacecraft blow up all the time, out in space nothing can be proven, and if you don’t, someone else will.