Gamers nexus on LTT - Star Trek: Website

Pretty damning review.

Their issues are:

  • Bad data - major errors in review videos
  • Ethical concerns - conflicts of interest, Billet review, Pwnage review
  • “Billet review” is downplaying by an extreme degree.

    They reviewed a cooler prototype designed for one product using a different one and claimed the product was not worth a purchase for anybody, ever. Linus was aware of the issue, but said the product was bad and not worth “$500 of extra time reviewing it correctly”.

    Then, they took this internal prototype that the company lended for review and, after claiming to be ready to give it back two times, SOLD IT to a random third party during an event. An event where competitors from the original company were visiting.

    The company already confirmed that was their best prototype and they were relying on it to iterate on the design.

    So LTT accepted a lent prototype from a new company, absolutely trashed the product in a review they purposely published with wrong methodology, then stole the prototype and sold it to God knows who.

    what they did to billet is goddamn evil
    Evil - least sheltered redditor, just an ass
    ruining a prototype product, talking shit about it, and then selling it is a lot worse than being “just an ass”
    K hes hitler the evil twins
    Damn, I thought we had a while before the 14 yr olds showed up on Lemmy.
    Ad hominems, buddy projecting find an argument next time
    Meanwhile you’re out here calling people redditors
    the dictionary definition of evil is “morally reprehensible”. you don’t need to overreact by going straight to a godwin
    So what we call hitler then
    Pink and crimson are both red. But vastly different shades of it
    Deep, so both linus and Hitler are evil ?

    The way they handled the billet situation can be argued to be

    The Linus as a person/ltt as a company as a whole isn’t

    So if linus did an evil deed, how we calling hitlers deeds then

    A darker shade of red

    Side note, people like you are why I miss the karma system and gilding. I can really appreciate a good troll, and used to give gold back in the day. Just know that some people out there are entertained by your work

    Tfw even u know how ridiculous it is to use the same adjective for linus and hitler so u have to resort to metaphors and ad hominems to avoid answering and hide your embarrassment, only ghosting me is left >.< farewell
    Oh, don’t worry, I won’t ghost you. How’s your day been?
    Still at deflection stage alright ghosting’s postponed for now
    Sounds like a long day
    Go back to reddit you weirdo
    3 different replies, can u not click reply after every sentence, control your adhd
    LTT should be getting the pants sued off of them for that kind of behavior. No way this whole cooler prototype thing was not nefarious.
    At the very least it appears incredibly reckless.
    What the fuck, that’s deplorable

    I think that their point that it’s an $800 product for a last-gen card, there really isn’t anyone out there that should buy this, and therefore it’s a bad product is valid. They could have handled the whole thing better and honestly should’ve just scrapped the video before release.

    Auctioning off the prototype when the company asked for it back is pretty inexcusable. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt that it wasn’t malicious, but they clearly have problems with internal communication of things like this are happening.

    At any rate, it’s going to be a spicy WAN show this week. Linus needs to actually watch the video and address this point-by-point. If he “reads the comments” or cherry picks some of GN’s weaker arguments he’s just going to end up throwing fuel on the fire.

    It’s pretty normal for water blocks to come out well after a GPUs release. Also it looks like it was a new product/company so it makes sense the design took longer than the competition.
    I dont think it was malicious, but it is incredibly negligent. It puts a huge stain on the company that’s expected to honor embargos for unreleased products.
    @wordle I also have the same thoughts as you.

    Then they shouldn’t have reviewed it if their decision was made before even holding the product in their hand.

    They could have reviewed it from the point of view of an R&D curiosity with the potential future iterations and cost reductions as the new startup finds their feet. Because, you know, that’s what it was. But they decided to shit all over it for dishonest reasons instead.

    I feel that if LMG looked at this product and thought “hey this is really dogshit”, the decent thing to do would have been to go back to billet and tell them we can’t cover it at all (and cop the loss of few hours as part of running an ethical business)

    This is hard to believe, it seems to comical.

    I believe you of course, and without accumulating enough about Linus’ & LTT’s antics I would have doubted you. I wonder what it is that causes these kinds of things to happen. I want to say success but I think there may be something about their ethos. Not what they espouse but what they sorta believe internally.

    I don’t understand why he won’t just own up to the wrong gpu thing and move on. It’s like getting pissy that the f150 exhaust sounds like shit on your ford ranger.

    If LMG gave out a prototype for their latest screwdriver to be reviewed and it was onsold, I highly doubt it being called a “mistake” would have sufficed, heads would be rolling

    Feel terrible for Billet and how they were treated here

    Ltt is certainly not innocent here but this one I’ll disagree with since it basically just happened to them with an early sample of the backpack.
    Billet was treated very bad here and i’m not trying to defend anyone, but i didn’t saw the video and only heard from them because of this shitshow