Gamers nexus on LTT
Gamers nexus on LTT
Their issues are:
“Billet review” is downplaying by an extreme degree.
They reviewed a cooler prototype designed for one product using a different one and claimed the product was not worth a purchase for anybody, ever. Linus was aware of the issue, but said the product was bad and not worth “$500 of extra time reviewing it correctly”.
Then, they took this internal prototype that the company lended for review and, after claiming to be ready to give it back two times, SOLD IT to a random third party during an event. An event where competitors from the original company were visiting.
The company already confirmed that was their best prototype and they were relying on it to iterate on the design.
So LTT accepted a lent prototype from a new company, absolutely trashed the product in a review they purposely published with wrong methodology, then stole the prototype and sold it to God knows who.
The way they handled the billet situation can be argued to be
The Linus as a person/ltt as a company as a whole isn’t
A darker shade of red
Side note, people like you are why I miss the karma system and gilding. I can really appreciate a good troll, and used to give gold back in the day. Just know that some people out there are entertained by your work
I think that their point that it’s an $800 product for a last-gen card, there really isn’t anyone out there that should buy this, and therefore it’s a bad product is valid. They could have handled the whole thing better and honestly should’ve just scrapped the video before release.
Auctioning off the prototype when the company asked for it back is pretty inexcusable. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt that it wasn’t malicious, but they clearly have problems with internal communication of things like this are happening.
At any rate, it’s going to be a spicy WAN show this week. Linus needs to actually watch the video and address this point-by-point. If he “reads the comments” or cherry picks some of GN’s weaker arguments he’s just going to end up throwing fuel on the fire.
Then they shouldn’t have reviewed it if their decision was made before even holding the product in their hand.
They could have reviewed it from the point of view of an R&D curiosity with the potential future iterations and cost reductions as the new startup finds their feet. Because, you know, that’s what it was. But they decided to shit all over it for dishonest reasons instead.
This is hard to believe, it seems to comical.
I believe you of course, and without accumulating enough about Linus’ & LTT’s antics I would have doubted you. I wonder what it is that causes these kinds of things to happen. I want to say success but I think there may be something about their ethos. Not what they espouse but what they sorta believe internally.
If LMG gave out a prototype for their latest screwdriver to be reviewed and it was onsold, I highly doubt it being called a “mistake” would have sufficed, heads would be rolling
Feel terrible for Billet and how they were treated here