Humans, apparently, throw like gods
Humans, apparently, throw like gods
pretty much all of our sports
The rest of the post is great, but this is simply not true
You can throw things at any sports.
If you’re not a coward.
Soccer includes accurate throwing from the goalie. I'd posit that hitting a projectile with a stick accurately is a close cousin of throwing.
That's all the big ones in US and EU that I can think of.
Baseball, basketball, soccer, football, cricket, rugby, hockey, what am I missing?
the goalie throwing the ball is an afterthought.
Games have been lost for less.
I’d posit that hitting a projectile with a stick accurately is a close cousin of throwing.
That’s just throwing with extra steps.
Yes - humans can throw things so some sports feature throwing.
Humans can kick, so some sports have kicking. Humans can punch, guess what, sports have punching. Humans can think logically, would you be surprised to hear about mind games?
I’d be more shocked if we had sports based around flying naked or extracting energy from sulphuric salts.
You’re kinda intentionally missing the point.
If you had to pick one uniquely human aspect to group together as many sports as possible, what would you pick?
Teamwork is out because wolves hunt in packs and lions hunt in prides. Logic is arguable, everything we do is based in either emotion or logic, so it’s not a good answer imo.
So what do you have left? Kicking and throwing are probably your best bets.
what would you pick?
If I want to create a set with the largest amount of sports? They’re team based. Humans are particularly good at forming teams, recognizing team members, allocating mental tasks to others and deep communications. In fact, these characteristics are a very large reason behind our taste for sports and cheering.
team work is out
Huh… if team work is out because wolves can do it, throwing objects is out because several animals can do it.
You might say they can’t do it as well as us… but wolves can’t do team play as well as us, so the argument is the same.
We invented the flame thrower. I know George Carlin did the bit best but… Imagine explaining that to a group of aliens.
“You… you throw what now?”
“Flames, bro.”
“For what purpose…?”
“Well, We had these people called Nazis and they liked to hide in concrete fortifications so we figured the best way to make them not be in there would be to fill it with fire.”
“Does that not harm these ‘nazis’?”
“Oh yeah, it harms them. That was like, a bonus.”
“Well, It was nice meeting you. Goodbye forever.”
Or white phosphorus! Wait, wait… how about the inquisition? Or the rape of south america or the roman catholic church…
Damn, why does everybody leave?
“So we created these chemicals for wars…”
“Ah, killing the enemy efficiently!”
“Well, no.”
“So they knock them out temporarily?”
“Haha, not exactly…”
“Then they’re useless?”
“No. They just really mess them up. It goes into their body really easily and it’s super carcinogenic, permanently fucks their DNA up, basically eats their skin, probably causes them to go blind, and will make them mentally fucked up. But it takes hours for them to notice the effect.”
“…What the hell is wrong with you guys?”
Monkeys have both force and accuracy when pelting humans with feces.
This is just inaccurate.
Seems like while on average a human can be expected to "naturally" throw better than a monkey, most monkeys are perfectly capable of learning to throw with skill comparable to a human.
Sources:
I'm not sure how you're getting that impression. The quote you put there doesn't show up in the paper even once, and in fact if you search for "aimed throwing" you'll see several instances where they discuss the aimed throwing accuracy of the monkeys. Even in just the abstract there's a few places where they make it clear the monkeys are aiming (and additionally that's what they were measuring).
For both species we found positive correlations between target distances for throwing accuracy, direction and strength of hand preference, percentage of bipedal vs tripedal throws, and percentage of overarm vs underarm throws.
In fact, they go so far as to clearly state that the monkey throwing is a suitable model of human throwing, meaning that the way they throw is similar enough to us that we can actually learn about ourselves from it.
We believe that the capuchin monkey is an informative nonhuman primate model of aimed throwing in humans and that research examining the throwing behavior of capuchins provides insight into the neurological and behavioral characteristics that underlie coordinated multi-joint movements across the primate order.
Anyway, that's all the time I'm gonna spend on this mythbusting lol.
I made a humourous claim that seemed logical, and when some good decided to claim I’m wrong, you swooped in with facts.
You’re my favourite.
Shooting =/= throwing
Btw have we seen him throw before? I’m genuinely curious
They throw it in from the sides with their hands, and it’s better to be able to throw it hard and accurately when you do that.
Face!