Is there a name for the phenomenon where the general public won't stop mentioning a solution that they /imagine/ will be standard one day without knowing the details behind it?

That's a word salad but like, "plug type won't matter once wireless charging becomes the norm" is, uh, a sentiment few people who know much about electricity transmission and electric vehicles will agree with, yet it's repeated ad nauseum.

@TechConnectify "wishful thinking" :)

@Greg But with a dash of mass-delusion?

Delusion's not the right word. But something like that.

@Greg @TechConnectify In terms of wishes, it'd be pretty cool if we could overcome the multitude of issues and limitations (efficiency, cost, power limits, etc)

But uhhhh yeah, seems pretty damn unlikely.

@TechConnectify there should be, it's a constant phenomenon

@TechConnectify we get the same thing "oh it'll all be wireless soon" with internet connectivity right? I don't know about your part of the world but I regularly hear people talking as if "well 5G means we don't need wires ever anymore because it's faster than the wired connection I have at home right now".

People just want a glowing rectangle connected permanently to everything but also to nothing and I can see how that might *feel* close but just ... no.

@mike @TechConnectify

in the novel I'm writing in my head, the future airwaves are so clogged with wireless signals that you have to pay for priority and there are sort of "internet ATMs" dotted around where you dock your phone to use the internet at any reasonable speed.

@mike @TechConnectify bad enough getting wifi coverage in my house with multiple access points that I ran ethernet cable down through the basement to feed the bedroom so I can work with a stable wired connection. Don't want to rely on network from outside the house.
@TechConnectify Oh don't worry, it's totally fine! Just make sure not to show your grandma your cool, wirelessly charging car.
@TechConnectify imo wireless charging is only necessary in very few circumstances. especially with transmission loss, even with improved technology, it can only approach wired efficiency, so there's not much reason to waste that extra energy
@moshibar @TechConnectify Won't someone think of the money the multibillion dollar power company would lose by having efficient electircal infrastructure?
@TechConnectify
Inside you there are two chargers

@TechConnectify ignorance on repeat.
It's sad that one quick look into the technology behind wireless charging will show just how power inefficient it is, yet many people would rather assume the cool-looking tech will be the winner than take two minutes to read up on its its potential shortcomings.

Reminds me of... well... ALL the gadgetbahns out there, promising the same solutions that a robust transit system for that region could have been solving all this time.

New and shiny gets pushed because new and shiny is sexy, and old tech is old and rusty and dingy and boring and doesn't sell tickets very well. It doesn't matter if it's a tried and true tech, companies would rather be pretending to experiment on the edge for a buck than provide a cheap reliable service no one gives much mind to.

@TechConnectify Counter inquiry. Is there a word for believing that a technology innovation will in time replace existing solutions in a linear fashion? I feel like those words could be brothers. Or, at least distant cousins.

@TechConnectify Ugh. Wireless charging is NOT what I would consider a "solution"; it just can't be as efficient, nor can it be as fast.

I would think if some of these people had both a wireless charger and a sizable power brick with a USB cable, they might see this.

@3DPrintingDad I have found that most people don't make those sorts of connections unless you show them.

Hence... my job!

@TechConnectify @3DPrintingDad On that note, perhaps this could be a good topic for a video?
@TechConnectify @3DPrintingDad I mean, you're Technology Connections, not Technology Transmissions.
@3DPrintingDad @TechConnectify wireless charging for a car is so bruh
@3DPrintingDad @TechConnectify with phones boasting the ability to share their charge, hopefully people will notice how losing 10% of your charge won't get even close to 10% of extra charge on the other phone...
@TechConnectify Considering how warm my phone gets when wirelessly charging at about 8 watts, I'm not sure I want to be near a car wirelessly fast charging.
@zorinlynx @TechConnectify I want to watch from a sufficiently safe distance. I suspect charging an 800V battery at 500A wirelessly will be ⚡️spectacular⚡️

I'm guessing that the name Tesla has special impact on that meme.

Some people are irrationally wedded to the (appealing) idea of wireless electric power, and some of *those* know that Nikola Tesla worked toward that goal. So they'll cheerlead for it at any opportunity.

https://teslasciencecenter.org/teslas-wireless-power/

@TechConnectify

Tesla's Wireless Power - Tesla Science Center at Wardenclyffe

More than a century after his death, Tesla’s wireless power discovery is a rarely credited to him.

Tesla Science Center at Wardenclyffe
@TechConnectify Do people actually think that? I hope they shut up & stop giving manufactures bad ideas!
@TechConnectify im in team “eh, a small adapter is fine, rapid charging is going to be more of a road trip thing than a regular daily thing for the vast majority of the population”.
@TechConnectify not sure it is quite right but I like wishcasting
@TechConnectify I have to imagine any wireless charging solution sufficient for an electric vehicle would be wildly dangerous
@cyclopsboi @TechConnectify They wouldn't be any more dangerous than the wireless phone charging mats we have now that you have to be careful not to place anything metallic on. My concern with a magnetic roadway is that it will confuse a piece of debris for a car and try to melt it like a giant induction furnace...
@TechConnectify wireless car charging tech would be a cool Technology Connections video. TeslaBjorn did a few videos on it a while ago but I'd like a more detailed explanation of the science behind it - particularly contrasting it against the kind of wireless charging used for phones.
@ragrum @TechConnectify that was a good video, which dispelled some myths repeated here. Wireless was slightly more efficient, as measured by calibrated utility-grade equipment. However it is also limited to 50KW (because of floor space), so it's a limited use case. That's to much for home charging, too slow for trip charging. Perhaps it's just right for mall charging? Is there a business case, given the added cost?
https://youtu.be/AE1gaNO9nj0
Wireless vs wired DC fast charging efficiency test

YouTube

@BernardRR @ragrum for clarity, I'm aware that there have been demonstrations that have efficiency on par with wired installations.

But I can't see a world in which wireless inductive pickups on cars is a truly reasonable cost to add to the vehicle, and charging infrastructure is a lot more expensive, too.

In the real-world, I can't see it as practical. Another solution in search of a problem, imo

@TechConnectify @BernardRR
I think the best use case I've seen for wireless charging is for buses (especially shuttle buses on short loops) which could top up their batteries in short charging sessions while they're on their route throughout the day, rather than needing to go offline to recharge their battery from empty.

@ragrum @BernardRR I honestly still see wireless charging as more of a hassle in that case. Overhead contact points with retracting charging paddles on the bus is, at least on a gut -level, the simpler, more powerful, and more robust option.

Ultimately wireless charging is simply trying to remove the need for operator action to charge, and it's by no means the only avenue to that end.

@TechConnectify @ragrum i kind of wish cities would look at other ways of suspending wires as i still think Trams and Trolley busses are better than battery buses in cities(although i do think they should have batteries too, like incase of diversion for trolley buses or power loss for both.)

@BernardRR @ragrum not to mention that even if we do make a successful and inexpensive inductive pickup device for the car, it's gonna be in a very vulnerable spot.

So it's like, we'll add a ton of cost to both car and infrastructure to, at best, meet wired efficiency and create a ton of new problems in the process... or we just connect the car right to the grid.

The latter seems like a pretty sensible choice to me.

@TechConnectify @ragrum I think it has a use case for some applications. Busses, ambulances, airport shuttles, maybe taxis. Anything where you might spend a good part of the day idling, and the vehicle is potentially in-use 24/7.
For personal vehicles it's an expensive option with very little upside.
@ragrum @TechConnectify @BernardRR Remember the UPPER limit is 50kw, so perfect for home charging.
@TechConnectify I'm sure it'll work out great, just like solar roadways

@TechConnectify
Quantum Computers are super fast.

No, they are not.

@TechConnectify A version of the nirvana flacy, looks like.
@TechConnectify thinking about the magnitude of magnetic field that could charge a car and remembering that guy in the MRI from a few months ago
@TechConnectify It's strongly associated with what many of us call "hype". So the suggestion of "hype blindness" resonates with me!
@TechConnectify I take it none of them have wireless charrged their phone when they only have like 30 minutes till they need to leave, only to then find they don't even have 10% battery.

@TechConnectify another example, at least here in the Netherlands: don't get solar panels or wind turbines, nuclear power will solve everything.

What they forget is that that takes a long time to build and will face even stauncher NIMBYs. If you don't want a solar park in your back yard, you are sure as hell not wanting a nuclear power plant either.

As for a term for that: uninformed optimism?

@TechConnectify
Groupthink Nirvana fallacy? Not sure that is an actually used word salad, but it feels accurate.
@TechConnectify like closing the border for immigrants

@TechConnectify What annoys me to no end is how proponents of wireless charging almost always forgets the inverse square law and how it works, and its limits.

There's a reason cable charging will always be superior, much like how wired Internet will always be superior for, ironically, similar reasons.