If this result is shocking, or you think Judge Chutkan is doing something outrageous, or it shows bias for Trump, or that it’s obviously wrong, you are not being a critical consumer of legal news, and should reconsider your diet of grifters.

@Popehat 1) You are generally a defense attorney, right? 2) You are generally -- to be very very sloppy in how I say this -- anti-Trump.

How mindful are you of balancing these two perspectives when trying to evaluate what you see in these Trump cases

@ceolaf @Popehat Listen to the Serious Trouble podcast and decide for yourself.

@pomCountyIrregs @Popehat Ken is clearly a very thoughtful person, and I suspect that he has given this issue a lot of consideration.

I am inviting him to share his thinking.

I could try to infer what he thinks, but I could be wrong. So, I asked.

@ceolaf That’s what the podcast is all about. This week’s public portion had exactly what you were asking.

@pomCountyIrregs I pay for and listen to the podcast.

No, he has not hit exactly what I was asking.

@ceolaf Then I apologize. I thought last week (I don’t subscribe) was a fair discussion of legitimate competing interests.