Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License · hashicorp/terraform@b145fbc

Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at https://hashi.co/bsl-blog, FAQ at https://hashi.co/license-faq, and...

GitHub
I have to say this is just horribly disappointing. #Hashicorp keeps becoming more and more hostile towards the people it wants as customers.

@tedivm Is it, though? I haven't dissected the new license, but it seems that the main change is the usual fight against the "you write the code, we'll make the money" deal.

I'm not *happy* about these changes, but I can see why they keep happening.

@PCOWandre @tedivm the BUSL is not open source:
https://spdx.org/licenses/BUSL-1.1.html

Edit: Sorry, it looked like your "is it though?" was referring to "open source" rather than "disappointing" on my end!

Business Source License 1.1 | Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX)

@johnny @tedivm Oh, I get the fact that a license that excludes certain use cases doesn't meet the definition of open source.

But I can understand why there's a new wave of licenses that provide source but exclude certain business models.