@wolfhuette @arielframe how can one distinguish seeking passive movement for enjoyment vs. passive movement for e.g. instinctual pref for predator avoidance?
There are huge ethical implications to asserting flies have play-like behaviour, and it would demand a very thorough investigation of evidence of reward response (eg hormonal, neural).
@arielframe I think that's my point. The present title and interpretation asserts play-like behaviour, but part of that definition is that there is no apparent benefit to the individual. I'm not sure I'd assert PLB simply off a behavioural preference if I didn't have any data to interpret possible underlying reasons for the preference.
Also not really up to me whether PLB qualifies for ethics, but flies currently aren't "animals" per ethics boards, they're basically bio-robots.
@arielframe @wolfhuette for instance, the carousel image evokes play. But had this study used a rotating arranged set of leafy sticks, would we really default to viewing it as play?
What's shown is that some flies have a stochastic pref for landing on moving objects. It just seems to me, admittedly a non-ethologist, that titling the paper "Seeking voluntary passive movement in flies is play-like behavior" is extrapolating beyond what is shown.