Apparently there is a hiring manager who refuses to look at resumes unless even twenty year old positions have full descriptions with them.

I'm exhausted. I've been told for over a decade NOT to put that stuff in because it's too wordy and will get my resume round filed.

So I have to hunt down old old resumes to remember what I even had there.

Between that and the rush rush rush on this one I'm getting very wary.

@catbailey i am strongly suspecting it’s an excuse they made up

@jerry Same; it's apparently what the person who vets resumes before they're officially submitted told the external recruiter talking to me.

The positions in question are literally a different field and one was three months and is only on the resume for the job title.

I wonder if a male name on it would get the same response... Are resumes with just a first initial generally accepted or trashed?

@catbailey well, it seems worthwhile to try.

@jerry Yeah. But...my alarms are going off.

It IS a .gov job. But still.

Which sounds more like "probably a guy", C Bailey or C.C. Bailey?

@catbailey I would go with C Bailey. You aren’t being dishonest and if you think this isn’t the position/organization to try experimenting with, that makes sense.

@jerry I may make it my generic for all resumes.

Also remembering that my last job appeared after I shortened my name on LinkedIn to something unusual but gender neutral to masculine Italian. May be time to do that again.

@jerry Changed it going forward -- on resume and LinkedIn both, and LI pronouns are now they/them.