Courtney Love hit the nail on the head years and years ago:
https://www.gerryhemingway.com/piracy

> Today I want to talk about piracy and music. What is piracy? Piracy is the act of stealing an artist's work without any intention of paying for it. I'm not talking about Napster-type software. I'm talking about major label recording contracts.

Now the same companies that had cried "protect the artists!" to extend copyright over and over again are salivating at the thought of replacing artists with software.

Artists now realize they had signed the rights to their own work over to middlemen, who use that very work to try replacing them.

When they signed these contracts, often years ago, there was no talk of "AIs" able to "generate content". That was not even on the horizon.

"We have altered the deal. Pray we don't alter it any further."

Would they have signed these contracts if that was clearly stated in the terms? Well, if the WGA strike is any indication, I'd wager a bet the answer is "no".

I hope this becomes a wake-up call to all #artists, to all creative people out there — a wake-up call not just about #AI and automatically generated content, but also, and more importantly, about how urgently we need solid #copyright reform.

We had been needing it for decades, in fact.

#Art is not supposed to be hoarded by Disneys or Sonys, not supposed to be locked in corporate vaults. Art is more than just means of "maximizaing shareholder value".

#Artists cannot be replaced by some software. But it will take corporate execs a few years to learn it the hard way.

Meanwhile, artists will be hurting, bad. They will need our support — they always did!

So support them directly, if you can. Boost their toots on here, buy their merch, donate to them via whatever means they accept, or just send in a good word.

♦️♦️♦️

As this seems to be blowing up, a call to #art: this is now a "share your art" thread. I shall boost, if alt-text is provided. 💜

@lispi314 I am not entirely on-board with the idea of abolishing copyright. I do believe it needs serious, deep reform, but abolishing it outright would have too many unintended consequences, in my opinion.

First and foremost, there would need to immediately be an alternative available for artists to be able to make a living. Copyright is broken, but it still allows a lot of artists to get paid.

Also, all of the copyleft software licenses would become unenforceable. To me, that's a big deal.

@rysiek On that first part, I think Patricia Taxxon (https://www.youtube.com/@Patricia_Taxxon/search?query=The%20Golden%20Calf) has a generally good idea of a model that actually makes sense & would work.

Not mentioned in her argument directly would be the importance of labor rights & organization in achieving it.

> Also, all of the copyleft software licenses would become unenforceable. To me, that's a big deal.
Likewise though would become any litigation for liberating software or info.
No cleanroom reverse-engineering nonsense any longer.