sad truth: as long as instances like .art keep moderating as they do ("proactively", guilt-by-association, etc.), Mastodon and the fediverse as a whole will stagnate.

I get that people want to keep it "manageable", but you also want more people to adopt the concept and ideology so we are not dependent on centralized services.

but new users will leave right away if they have to deal with federation issues if they can't interact with friends.

and of course, I'm not defending bad instances that spew bad stuff and attack others, are badly moderated and whatnot, everyone is free to block those off if they need to

but the whole deal of "association" and crap needs to stop.

@pixel I agree with you. I’m more for just blocking a handful of instances that are just for trolling and everything else is up to individual users to block.
@pixel i see issues even before that point tbh, for better and for worse we have inherited a lot of culture from open source shit including being shit to people abt stuff they have no way of knowing and the software doesnt indicate or teach
@desea the software shouldn't have to teach either, because people don't want to go through a "tutorial" to use a social network
@pixel right but the expectation that its acceptable behaviour to scold someone for shit they dont know and dont rlly get told anywhere and their first exposure to this being shit on for not doing it is bullshit

@desea yeah, that is indeed.

some stuff needing to be CWd is fine, but people should be respectful about it and not attack others

@pixel i think that reckless mentality kinda expands into being way too proactive about blocklists too
@pixel is “stagnation” bad? would it be preferrable to get bigger numbers at the cost of keeping an organization in people's timelines that has the reputation to be transphobic / platforming bigots?

@alinanorakari it hasn't even gotten to that point, but if they were to bring bigoted people etc. on here then they can rightfully do that, no offense then!

I assume the bigoted people want reach and whatnot and that is pretty hard to get on fedi anyway so I assume they wouldn't stick here for long anyway if so.

@pixel the BBC spreading transphobia on fedi is inevitable. It's not "some people in the BBC” it’s “The BBC as an institution”.
Why wait until somebody gets hurt by it when people on .art seem to prefer the proactive style because that makes .art a safe place.

The ability to defederate without a central committee or CEO deciding is the key strength of the fediverse and .art cutting out who the heck they want for what ever reason is exactly what some folks need to be on the fediverse

@alinanorakari I guess that is fair, instances are free to moderate who they want to.

and for the BBC, whatever.

I'm mostly a bit agitated by a thing that recently happened where a larger instance was cut off for association again, even though having strict moderation for themselves.

in most cases it is good that we have the tools to do what we need to do, but if people that are innocent are affected it just kinda sucks.

@pixel it may suck for some people who are not on .art, yes, maybe even for some on .art, who would hopefully have spoken up. I would guess they were ok with the decision

Some decisions can't be made fairly without also making them a lot of work. I'm sure It’s a tradeoff the mod of .art made to keep the marginalized users there safe. If in doubt decide in favor of their own users. Reduce moderation work in order to be able to keep doing it. Nobody is being held hostage on any instance

@alinanorakari all of these points are valid

I'm just thinking about new users mostly, artists tend to be one of the crowd moving here mostly

and if people are not really accustomed to fedi, but encounter issues with the federation aspect, that's just a point where they might go back to Twitter if they can talk to their friends there

simply because even if instance migration is possible, it is a hassle to people.

we don't need to water down what's currently there for new people...

@alinanorakari ...but all of these things are problems that might cause people to not stick to here.

Of course, fedi is not for everyone too, and .art does not need to bow down if it's their choice.

@pixel I wonder why the needs of new people take precedence over the needs of existing fedi users for you. I would argue it should be the other way around. How would you feel if a vaguely bigoted instance popped up and you were on an instance that decided not to defederate for the benefit of twitter users who might want to migrate there?

@alinanorakari I mean, having both things would be great.

and, if my instance were not to act, I as a user have the tools to make sure I don't have to deal with users/the instance myself.

it can be handled both ways really, and it's up to an instance.

@alinanorakari @pixel >when somebody gets hurt

When they cry? Who gives a crap? They have tools at their disposal to silence them, unless they are being attacked by users of that instance of course. That’s when an admin needs to get involved. The entire idea of “please defederate them, a user of theirs hurt my feelings” is a horrible idea.

@alinanorakari @pixel also, guilt by association is not a healthy policy for the fediverse. This has been echoed thousands of times
@pixel The idea that they are moderating proactively is nonsense.. They are moderating to the whims of their users, which attracts more users with whims. Its a cycle that ultimately results in servers like art, that has moderated to the point of abuse just to appease their users rather than based on anything that actually needs moderating.
@pixel should I interpret this as ".art is making the Fediverse look worse for all of us"? Or as ".art's motives are more and more common and that's bad"?

@atlas_core more of the first

moderation is good, I don't really say anything against that, it's good when mods take care of their space

but deferation is in quite a few cases thrown around pretty quickly where it shouldn't be

@pixel Noting that I have a few friends, although not here, who have a few pretty dumb views (conservatism...).

Sometimes, it's like we talk past each other... When it comes to a few issues. So, I have an idea of what that can be like.

I think that every instance tends to have it's own standard (and I'm not thinking of instances dedicated to hate per se), more or less, and it's probably not tenable to carve up the map everywhere.

@pixel it's what drove me away from the concept years ago. just didn't want to deal with it. but i care enough about my freedom and know enough about other shit now that running an instance was just the way to do things. an acquaintance had their self-hosted instance blocked for an unknown reason as well, and apparently they have a pattern of blocking small instances running alternative software? its all very weird. seems to be lots of chains of "you don't publicly state you block X so we'll block you" and all that. its not terribly transparent so it's very hard to pick apart lol
@pixel i've seen a lot of instances with a huge blocklist, my former home instance had already become one of them after I resigned from there...
@pixel hopefully they’ll leave for instances with moderation policies that are more in-line with their viewpoints.

@pixel Yup. Like, I totally get wanting to block instances that have truly reprehensible content, but blocking for inane reasons like, say, replying _once_ to someone on a "no-no instance" borders on... something I can't find the right word for.

Single-user instances are perhaps a solution as you have absolute control and are not beholden to another individual, but it's not a viable one for the majority of users, sadly.

@pixel The hilarious part to me here is that stux of all people is complaining about getting defederated or whatever: https://mstdn.social/@stux/110570709034574825 #PotMeetKettle
stux⚡ (@[email protected])

.art has been unblocked because it was a bad decsion from my part to block the whole community instead of the nasty admin.. Unblocked the domain and suspended the admin I'm afraid it's only a matter of time before that admin is gonna look for things to ban us That's what they do

Mastodon 🐘