"On the contrary, the otherwise stable Netherlands has been thrown off balance. Huge protests, burning bales of straw, political divisions, intense polarisation between rural and urban areas.

And for what? To save an #agriculture that may be technologically world-leading, but no longer means more to the economy than 1.4 per cent of GDP."

Insanely well written (in Danish 🇩🇰 ), interesting article on #sustainability (or not) of Dutch agriculture in @informeren

#NLpol
https://www.information.dk/udland/2023/07/stoerre-hurtigere-vildere-landbrugsland-sejrer-ihjel?kupon=eyJpYXQiOjE2OTA3NDU3NTMsInN1YiI6IjIyMjUyMDo3OTc2NjkifQ.gj7ns84lR28-lbq6Dw5HmQ

Større, hurtigere, vildere: Et landbrugsland sejrer sig ihjel

Holland har verdens mest avancerede og succesfulde industrilandbrug. Ingen kan dyrke en tomat mere effektivt, og ingen sender mere kød rundt i Europa. Nu siger naturen stop.

Dagbladet Information

[This is a low-quality translation of a danish article of the newspaper information]

-- Larger, faster, wilder: A farm country's victory is killed --

The Netherlands has the world's most advanced and successful industrial farming. No one can grow a tomato more efficiently, and no one sends more meat around Europe. Now the nature stops.

WAGENINGEN, HOLLAND – Central in the Atlas Building at Wageningen University stands a young woman at a small podium and reads high from the latest climate report. She doesn't cry, the voice is not raised, her little protest summer as a mouse in the big floor.

Around her sit African, Asian and Dutch students. Some eat lunch, some make homework, some speak together with a cup of coffee. Some are as her highly concerned about the climate crisis, others are more admitted by what you have always been admitted to the Wageningen University: to optimise, streamline and increase production. Develop new technologies that enable us to force the most possible food out of at least possible soil with at least possible effort. Grise with several ribs, cows with greater udders, plants with many tomatoes.

The famous University is one of the sacred halls of the industrial farming. A cathedral over the borderless progress and a crucial part of what until a few years ago was considered an unconditional Dutch success story.

The Netherlands is a small country, less than Denmark, but one of the world's leading agricultural nation. Non-organic vegetables or the non-organic beef in the supermarket, are often produced in the Netherlands. No one can cultivate as many tomatoes, cucumbers or peppers per square metres as the Dutch. No one sends more meat around Europe. And no places have food production less common with Jens Hansen’s farm. Dutch agriculture is a science. It is milking robots, vertical cultivation and fully automatic greenhouses.

Last year the Netherlands earned more money with agricultural exports than Brazil. A country that is otherwise more than 200 times as big. In certain statements, the Netherlands is the second largest exporter of food, surpassed only by the United States. However, it requires that you also count the products that simply arrive in Rotterdam port to be distributed beyond Europe.

But no matter how to do it, the Dutch produce almost unlogical amounts of food. It is a high-tech power performance that has grown out of the Wageningen University, which has now established itself as the global center of the food industry. Food Valley calls the cluster of companies located around the university. The answers to Silicon Valley.

For more than 100 years, and in particular after World War II, Dutch agriculture has gone from victory to victory under the motto greater, wilder, faster. In recent years there has been a pressure to get it down again.

“Please, the list two the science and ACT,” stands at the podium in front of the young woman. Behind her has a statue of the Greek corn god Demeter from 1879 got a tie for her eyes. It is also part of a climate action.

I was actually well warned that the climate activists were moved behind enemy lines. Over the phone a pleasant farmer and former student named Judith told me that Wageningen once was a fantastic institution, but that I should fit:

“The hand is also a part of professors who are, what to say, vegan.’

And students, apparently.

“Polarization has also reached Wageningen,” says the person from the University’s press staff, Jan Bol – a mid-age man with a friendly, round head.

“A lot is going on about climate, about how we feed people. Some students think we do too little, the peasants think we do too much,” he says.

In other words: Here in the Atlas building you are not doubt that agriculture is also in the Netherlands on a cross road. You can continue with full speed towards bigger, wilder and faster. Or you can change it all, cut down on meat production and produce with more sustainable and less profitable methods. You can also try to make a little of it all at once.

- Dutch-Danish recipe for success -

Krijn Poppe is not vegan. He was employed at the University of 1981, when the progress still had free races. In fact, there were departments for both sociology and environment.

“You just didn’t listen to them,” says it now retired agricultural farmers.

It was perhaps stupid, but it is obviously easy to say now.

The Netherlands emits too much nitrogen. It strangles the streams, pollutes the groundwater, and destroys biodiversity. And it is completely considered the production of agricultural animals. Of course, they are about four million Dutch cattle significant contributions to the country’s CO2 budget. Over half of the discharges from the global food industry come from the animal production, a large study for a few years ago. Just like some years ago, we hopefully about peak oil – that oil production had to have the top – you are now talking about peak meat.

» We have far more agricultural animals than the climate can hold and the problem is the intensity of agriculture,” said one of the researchers behind the study, Pete Smith, to The Guardian earlier this year.

“I’m not surprised that the Netherlands is first in this conflict, because the country also has the biggest problem. «

The battle does not mention well. In fact, it was an alien political conflict, which this month finally became the government to break together. But the coalition has long been collapsed during the weight of the last year's massive resistance to the plans to reduce the number of agricultural animals and thus live up to the EU environmental requirements.

» An inevitable transition,” the government has called it. Nevertheless, it is still not managed to implement plans. On the contrary, it has been pushed out of balance. Huge protests, burning strawballs, political division, intense polarization between country and city.

And for what? To save a farm that might be technological world-leading, but which no longer means more for the economy than 1.4 percent of bnp.

It is easy to say that you should have listened to the warnings that sociologs and environmental researchers once tried to penetrate with. And it is easy to say that the Dutch should now take large parts of the strong polluting agriculture.

- The Dutch created the Netherlands -

In the sense there is a part of the collapse between the Netherlands and Denmark, Krijn Poppe tells. Two countries with many of the same problems – two countries that have gone into the same trap if you want. Two agricultural countries who are victoring themselves. To understand the trouble we are now in, you should also understand how we did end here, Poppe believes.

Denmark and the Netherlands have largely followed the same historical curve. When globalisation hit agriculture last in the 1800s, you could not as France and Germany turn inwards and protect its peasants against cheap American grains. The home market was too small. The Netherlands and Denmark were – and are – small, open export economies.

» They did the only thing you can do when the whole economy is bound to sell food abroad: They repented, they competed, they innovated,” he says.

Whipped to produce better and cheaper than the others, agricultural universities and research institutes were opened. The award in the Netherlands, Landboskole in Denmark. Governments supported the development of new technologies. Today you might call the industrial policy. With the andels movement, agriculture was organised in greater communities with higher productivity. Especially in the Netherlands there was also what you can call an agroindustrial complex. Rabobank is still one of the world's largest agricultural banks. Unilever is still one of the world’s largest food companies. FrieslandCampina is still one of the world's largest dairy. Everyone can draw their roots to the end of the 1800s, and all they have with great success and for great pleasure for ordinary Dutchmen followed the recipe: bigger, wilder, faster.

It is called that God created the earth, but the Dutch created the world. Nearby as a giant Lynetteholm project (an artificial island in Copenhague) is just 20 percent of the country mass established in the sea. With great effort, you have cultivated the true soil in the east. An area that corresponds to half times Manhattan is covered by giant Drishus complexes – small towns of glass.

Today, the Dutch can cultivate up to 100 kilos of tomatoes per year on a single square meter, and every milk cow gives average nearly 10,000 liters of milk per year.

The goal of bnp may only contribute with quite small numbers, but the high-tech agriculture has a symbolic force. It is the monument to the fact that the Netherlands with particularly great success has championed nature and bolted in the modernity. The Netherlands is a agricultural country.
Intelligent solutions

Just because nature has now come back to revenge, of course, you can not say that the Dutch must necessarily turn the back to the modernity, technology and demand to optimise. As it applies in all corners of the green transition, the technology is in its way both the cause and the solution to the problems.

Although the enemy has penetrated the Wageningen, even if Demeter has been given a tie for the eyes, and the IPCC report sums around the Atlas building, the University is not marked by ambitions to return to a more traditional before state-of-the-art agriculture.

[1/2]

#Agroecology #Agriculture #ClimateChange #NitrogenPollution #DutchFarming #IndustrialAgriculture #Netherlands #Dutch #Dairy #Farming #EUAgriculture #FoodSecurity #FoodSovereignity #SmartAgriculture

https://www.information.dk/udland/2023/07/stoerre-hurtigere-vildere-landbrugsland-sejrer-ihjel?kupon=eyJpYXQiOjE2OTA3NDU3NTMsInN1YiI6IjIyMjUyMDo3OTc2NjkifQ.gj7ns84lR28-lbq6Dw5HmQ

Større, hurtigere, vildere: Et landbrugsland sejrer sig ihjel

Holland har verdens mest avancerede og succesfulde industrilandbrug. Ingen kan dyrke en tomat mere effektivt, og ingen sender mere kød rundt i Europa. Nu siger naturen stop.

Dagbladet Information

The friendly public relations officer, Jan Bol, shows us around campus. Large, sterile buildings in glass and steel. Just share greenhouse, laboratory and tech company. In a building, a well-established dark-haired researcher works with a sci-fi-like watering system where so-called intelligent cameras keep an eye on the greenhouse and doses fertilizer and water for the specific plants that need it. Not far from there is another researcher and works with some climate chambers. Small compartment with heavy doors, where you can regulate light and humidity, so it simulates a specific climate. In one of them he has a lot of cabbage varieties, so he can find out which is doing best through droughts.

There are people trying to find useful genes in wild tomato – the commercial, Dutch tomato’s hopeless ineffectiveness. Some who hope to cure the fungus infection that has ravened the world's banana plants. An entire corner of greenhouses is dedicated to experimenting with different diseases. Here, the risk of experimenting with viruses is large, it is a kind of Wuhan lab.

It works all very useful. It may not be special romantic. You do not have the feeling of a special covenant with nature. But the small cameras can probably save a lot of water and fertilizer. Refine it in advance excellent – and measured per produced unit also relatively sustainable – Dutch vegetable production.

Of the barely 14,000 students at Wageningen are about 3,500 from abroad, many of them from countries in the global south, where agriculture could well use a shot of technology-based progress. In a traditional farming in Nigeria, a cow does not give more than 500 liters of milk a year. In Angola they grow at average 250 grams of tomatoes per square meter – i.e. 400 times less than the Dutch maximum.

In the perspective, you can also ask why you need to cut down for the absolutely most effective agriculture in the world. As no farmer in the Netherlands has yet neglected to say to me: We are constantly more on the planet. Soon we must feed ten billion people.

- New monster, the same accident -

As it is the case most places, it is especially the industrial production of animals that create environmental issues in the Netherlands. Less than 200 kilometres north from here is the Wageningen University Dairy Campus. The students who work with animals are generally less climate activists. They prepare to be milk, cattle or pig farmers.

Nevertheless, the studies have changed character. The Dairy Campus’s website is plasticed with formulations about the Dutch milk farmers’ ‘enorme challenge’ with the ‘bearable switch’.

“Mostly it’s still about what feed gets cows to give most milk. But we also measure the effect of the ammonia content in the urine,” says Jan Bol.

The problem is, of course, that – with the exception of the peasants themselves – almost everyone who knows something about it agrees that there must be fewer animals in the Netherlands. No matter how much you get down the ammonia content in their urine, there is no solution if the Netherlands should live up to the EU environmental requirements. Less milk cows, fewer slaughter cows, fewer pigs, fewer chickens. It says researchers, it says a coalition of politicians that range from the left wing to the center-right. It also says the retired agricultural Minister Krijn Poppe. What he calls productivism – thus greater, wilder, faster – has worked “explored well”, he thinks.

“But on some stretch, there are also some things that need to change to meet the challenges of climate and biodiversity.”

He believes that in 2040 there have to be 25 percent fewer animals in the Netherlands. Politicians from the country have aired numbers as high as 50 percent. Regardless of the exact number, many millions of animals are no longer to be produced – and are produced in this context is the right word – in the Netherlands. And maybe more crucial: thousands of Dutch farmers that no longer need to be farmers.

But, if you can invent, progress continues.

In “Vredens Druer”, John Steinbeck’s epos on the suffering of the land proletariate, it is the tractor that drives the family Joads away from the hard, but safe life as a farmer in Oklahoma. There is no need for them, explains a representative of the bank that owns the earth. It is not our decision, he emphasizes, but a consequence of the structures. The development, the economy, the progress – the big wheels you can not stop once they have started. Steinbeck calls it ‘unhyret’. This has also been in the Netherlands.

In 1950 there were 400,000 farmers in the Netherlands. In 1970 there were 185,000. Today there remain about 50,000. However, production is many times higher. Today, Dutch dairy supplies more than 15 times as much milk as in 1950.

The tractor came, and then the milk robot and the intelligent cameras, and suddenly there was no need for people anymore. In 2016 alone – i.e. before the nitrogen crisis and politicians’ plans to reduce –22 farmers closed every day. Last year, every fourteenth day there was a Dutch farmer who committed suicide.

How is the price of progress. Now the big wheels turn again, this time in another direction.

There must be fewer animals. It is not higher, wilder and faster, but lower, calmer and slower. As Steinbeck’s bankers, the Dutch politicians emphasize that it is not with their good will. They are bound by forces that are greater than them themselves. It is the structure, it is ‘unhy law’. However, for each peasant, the outcome is the same. They must leave their hard, but safe life, as peasants. The Netherlands remains perhaps an agricultural country, but they should no longer be farmers.

[2/2]

[Sorry for the not very sophisticated translation 😅 ]

@Ruth_Mottram : Thank you for bringing this really awesome article into the fediverse 

@earthworm @Ruth_Mottram
> The Netherlands remains perhaps an agricultural country, but they should no longer be farmers.

The conclusion seems nonsensical, or has it completely backwards: rather than continuing a grotesque scale of industrial production with pathetic 4% share of organic farming, the Netherlands must turn from techno-optimistic paperclip maximizers into non-specialised farmers once again, along with the rest of the world.

@khobochka

I am not sure whether I translated it right 🙈.

But I agree totally with you. Agricultural work, given good labour conditions, can be very fulfilling (a more manual agricultural system has the potential to be much more environmental friendly).
As in many other areas, industrialization gives large output per human labor hour, but the remaining jobs are shitty and underpaid and/or disconnected from the nicer parts of being a farmer...

@earthworm Thank you for taking time to translate it (especially considering that it's appears to be [softly] paywalled)! 💚

It's an interesting article, and it describes different aspects of the situation quite well, so I'm nitpicking here I admit =]

@khobochka @earthworm yeah I think the Danish verb skal is causing some difficulty with the translation in the last part. It doesn't have a direct one to one equivalent in modern English. What the writer is really pointing out is that in spite of the massive industrialisation of agriculture, the farmers themselves are having real financial problems surviving. It's in that sense they "shouldn't" be farmers.
I hope this helps.