Trump, so far (important, as he has a racketeering charge coming in Georgia, and we haven’t gotten to his attempted coup to overturn the presidential election he lost), has been indicted on 34 state felonies, 40 federal felonies, and is a rapist.Tell me a single other politician (let alone President) that has been indicted for as many or more state and federal felonies?

Name a single one with more. In all of US history. Don’t worry, we’ll wait.

You’re literally and factually drunk on the Kool aid. Trump is a Cancer on our society. And everyone that has supported him and still supports him is a traitor to our democracy. We have laws for a reason. You can’t pick who we should enforce the law on and who we can’t. Trump believes he’s above the law. You believe we should be looking at other people.

Here’s what I along with so many other right-minded people believe - if you broke the law, no matter what side of the aisle you’re on or what you do for a living, you can’t break the law and get away with it.

2024 is going to be hell for trump, because justice is finally catching up with him. I don’t give a shit about hunter biden, he did some crimes, right? He should pay for them.

Trump attempted to destroy evidence to cover up his cover up. He should and will pay. No matter what people like you try to say or attempt to paint a different picture that’s rosy to your cult.

I have hatred for people that believe they’re above the law. Including many supreme court justices, who, surprise, are on the same side of the aisle as you and your squeaky clean leader.

Don’t take it personal, I’m angry at your whole group that are too blind to see this, either ignorantly or willfully.

She should be punished for mishandling classified information, as much as Trump should be punished for using an unsecured phone for his presidential duties. As we keep saying in this thread, it's possible to have a consistent opinion in all of this.

Next you have to prove that her servers were handled that way for the purpose of tampering with evidence in a court of law. Y'know, like people are trying to do right now with Trump? The problem here is the matter of proof. It's unfortunate for Trump that his lackeys were caught trying to destroy evidence and, y'know, left behind evidence of trying to do so, but that's what it takes to prosecute someone for that particular crime.

Let me reframe the question for you. Do we think Hilary and her aides should be prosecuted if evidence supported targeted tampering instead of incompetence? Yes. If it was deliberate, is it a shitty thing that she and her staff was not prosecuted on the basis of that evidence? Also yes.