The evidence that cars don’t work as primary mass transport in cities is everywhere: traffic jams, air pollution, accident rates, the shocking fraction of city space taken up by parking spaces, safety barriers/bollards etc. This 100 year experiment should be declared over, and we should put proper effort into the systems that HAVE been shown to work and scale: walking, cycling, e-cargo bikes, cheap/accessible/reliable public transport. This “argument” about LTNs is just lazy delay. #LTN #cities

@helenczerski In Dulwich, south London, there’s been a lot of anger about the LTNs, but from my perspective (as someone who doesn’t own a car) they’ve made the roads quieter, safer, cleaner and nicer to use.

The initial designs were a bit restrictive, but changes to allow emergency access seem to have fixed those concerns. Overall, LTNs seem to deliver, and the only “argument” should be about how to extend their impact and ensure car-free travel is safe, cheap, and timely.

@Myryama @helenczerski and accessible even for those from rural places like myself.

@jahruhn @helenczerski Accessibility hasn’t been reduced - all the roads remain reachable by car - but the changes ended the rat-running. That’s what makes the difference.

In other words, you can freely drive into an LTN (albeit via a different route) but you can’t drive through it.