This is what happens when you pay people for the work they do. (Via @Radical_EgoCom)
@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom hell yeah, they make fantastic films too. Good for them.

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom
Small independent studios are able AND willing to meet union demands.
How is this "unrealistic" or "unreasonable"?

What IS unreasonable?
Paying a CEO $27M per year, THAT is unreasonable.

@aburtch
there's gonna be so many good and also really bad A24 films coming up. I hope they greenlight everything

@Radical_EgoCom

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom not just pay people, but pay them fairly.

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom To meet all the financial demands of the WAG/SAG-AFTRA strike would cost a paltry 420 million.... The colossal flops that were The Flash, and Dial Of Destiny cost waaaaaay more than that combined.

There is no end of existing money to meet these demands.

#StayStrong
#Solidarity

@aburtch @[email protected] A24 just continues to be the coolest people in the film industry.
@aburtch

On top of that, they make great movies
@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom I wouldn't say A24 is small budget but the point stands
@aburtch @[email protected] @lisamelton at a glance of the thumbnail i thought this was going to be about logo design.
@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom It does not have to be a fight to the death or a mutual suicide pact (corporate media vs. the creative class). As soon as we can agree on dignity and fairness as mutual priorities, we’ll be getting somewhere. But writers and artists are not going to be ranched like veal.

@BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom I agree with your sentiment, but we’ll never get there because corporations aren’t people. They have no moral compass, no compassion, nothing. Their only purpose is profit and they are punished by shareholders if they don’t go to extreme lengths in pursuit of it.

Dignity and fairness are not priorities for corporations, only profit.

For example, Netflix paid their CEO more money last year than the writers are requesting over the course of their entire contract.

@aburtch @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom the history of the belief that corporations exist only to make a profit is fascinating and relatively new. It's not codified in law, charter or history. It's a fairly radical rewrite of history, and ignores virtually all of the last 300 years of practice.

https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/04/16/what-are-corporations-obligations-to-shareholders/corporations-dont-have-to-maximize-profits

Corporations Don't Have to Maximize Profits

The business judgment rule gives directors protection from judicial second-guessing about how to best serve their companies and shareholders.

@Seruko @aburtch @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom correct.
Milton Friedman has a lot to answer for with the wholesale adoption of the Friedman Doctrine by the financial sector (which then trickled into everything they financed)

"so we don't have to give a shit about social and environmental impacts as long as shareholders make bank?? Sign us up!"

@Seruko @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom Sure, there are B Corps and sole proprietorships who care about their employees. And it may not have always been that way.

But the reality we live in today is that CEOs have more money than they can spend in 1,000 years while teachers have to work multiple jobs to get by. And it’s not changing unless someone makes them. So far no one can or has.

@aburtch @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom exactly. A corporation has only one purpose: to give the stock holders profit. It's literally the only thing they exist to do.
SAG-AFTRA's Duncan Crabtree-Ireland On Why Apple's 'Tehran' Got A Waiver

Following SAG-AFTRA’s clearance of AppleTV+’s Israeli spy series Tehran and New Line’s horror movie Watchers –prolific projects from AMPTP studios that the guild remains in …

Deadline
@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom so what youre saying is that by going with their terms works out for both companies!??!?!??!?!
@aburtch @[email protected] bUt teH GroWth wiLL sLow DoWN!