I suspect that very soon, perhaps within a year, we will hear from other whistleblowers, possibly even some with direct, hands-on experience, who will come forward to corroborate what David Grusch is saying. Again, this is just a prediction, but things seem to be moving much faster than in previous years, and I believe this hearing has only put more weight on the accelerator.

Yeah, you should also watch some of his News Nation interview from a few weeks ago. He’s tried really hard not to use terms like “aliens” or “extraterrestrial” but always says things like non-human entity.

newsnationnow.com/…/we-are-not-alone-the-ufo-whis…

It’s possible, as suggested by the committee member, that it could be an indirect or passive harm cause such as radiation.

As for the “biologics” it’s been implied to be bodies, but that info has been second hand to Grusch. Though, he’s been confident enough in his sources to bring that info forward. Whatever has been recovered was clearly enough biological matter to say it’s not human or anything familiar.

I know right? First time I’ve heard that people have been hurt by nbe’s?

Yeah, excited to see next steps and hopefully get more from the next session.

Some surprising discussions in this hearing: Gaetz talking about the orb photo from Eglin, Biggs bringing up the Phoenix Lights, and I loved how every time Grusch said he couldn’t discuss things in this setting, everyone was like “ok, let’s talk after this then in a SKIF”

Agreed. I feel a lot of people were getting their hopes up that this would be the day of disclosure. But, there is too much to put out in the open in one sitting. Storming out with bombshells is an easy way for the public and media dismiss facts. I’m looking forward to discussions building off of today’s statements. I just hope that there is little lull between hearings and public statements. Keeping this in the spotlight will help build public demand for the truth.

I’m hoping it will legitimize the subject for more people. My large family group text blew up over the hearing. To see such unanimous bipartisan concern should be pretty eye-opening to people on both sides of the aisle. Especially in this hypertoxic political stage.

It’s definitely been low-covered in the media here in the states. It sort of got big a few weeks ago when a very small, almost unknown newstation called “News Nation” picked up the Grusch interview. It was covered heavily there, but… no one watches that channel.

Afterwards, some of the big stations picked it up and some newspapers too, but it was forgotten pretty quickly. Unless you were already in this “circle of information”, you probably wouldn’t have heard about it. Maybe it’ll get picked up after today (but probably forgotten about by Friday)