New design patent decision from NDIL in Illinois Toolworks v. Termax: https://www.scribd.com/document/661271150/Illinois-Tool-Works-v-Termax-Complaint#
I haven't read this whole decision yet but since I've got § 103 on the brain...
This reference is definitely not (as the accused infringer argued here) anticipatory.
But is it (or should it be) a proper primary reference for the purposes of § 103?
I suspect that, under current law, the Federal Circuit would say "no."
But I think the answer should be "yes."
