Jonic
Spring Jo 🥚 
🍀🔄
Kiiyowo@ShadowJonathan The whole universe just deadlocked itself now, whoops.
Gabbo the wafrn dev guy[mentionuserid="683208c9-b6a0-4674-9191-3275c7b3c025"] you are not gonna like my code then
GTB 
@ShadowJonathan async, await!
Aaron@goren @ShadowJonathan The superhero with terrible timing...
Antifa Warlord@ShadowJonathan My past week has literally been awaiting and map/reducing nested arrays of promises and I wanna die
liftsawait spinForever();
Venykrid@ShadowJonathan
Gtk devs:
Gtk devs:
thorsummoner@ShadowJonathan I love that we never finished the graphic (we have no idea when it's done)
Denian@ShadowJonathan I get the feeling that somebody seriously misunderstands how async works. That person should first travel back to the start of the century and enter JavaScript Callback Hell, then jump forward by about 15 years to learn to appreciate promises, and then come back to learn to appreciate async.
@Denian it's a joke of a joke, the original joke was to bash async (or anything, really, look up "stop doing math") and then do it overtly so that it becomes funny, but in this case the joke is cut off strategically because of the whole "await" thing
TerrorBite 🦁@Denian @ShadowJonathan Thanks to promises and await, I can now write synchronously blocking code in JS!
TransitBiker@TransitBiker programming joke
taylor 
@ShadowJonathan @Sterophonick feel this whenever a function reaches its end but the calling function doesn't resume
Luke@ShadowJonathan The world is asynchronous https://youtu.be/RfvL_423a-I
AWS re:Invent 2022 - Keynote with Dr. Werner Vogels
Charlie Wilson@ShadowJonathan okay this one is my favourite
MyFairJulie@ShadowJonathan What comes first? Async? Await? Nice hen and egg problem there, Microsoft!
LisPi@ShadowJonathan CSP basically does everything async does better, more legibly and you can easily scale it over multiple cores without program changes.
Scaling over multiple hosts requires only some slight changes.
@ShadowJonathan i hope you enjoy my contribution
@ShadowJonathan oh it messed up. the 2nd frame is supposed to be way longer. but i guess this is far more frustrating and ironically far more accurate
Pixel Dunn
migrated@ShadowJonathan CSP > Async, Preemptive scheduling > non-preemptive scheduling.
Thank you for coming to my talk.
Corbin@lispi314 @ShadowJonathan Could I offer you a continuation monad while you wait?
@corbin @ShadowJonathan I dislike the monadic terminology around continuations, it's a lot more confusing and vague than that which Scheme uses.
Delimited continuations are very different from other types of continuations.
@corbin @ShadowJonathan That being said, I consider that to use continuations in this case would require leaking more through the abstractions (is it local or not? Single thread of execution or not?) than what looks like message-passing or procedure-calls (remote or local, both are trivial to add onto message passing).
@lispi314 @ShadowJonathan Good points. I think that purity is relevant; we usually intend for deferred actions to be impure and not idempotent, which is exactly the case where the continuation monad is non-trivial.
@ShadowJonathan hw interrupts ftw
Cody 
@ShadowJonathan Ok, I'll use Subscribers (?
Шьрежога/Śreżoga@ShadowJonathan
That feel when your logic has to wait for clock while mine has solved at the speed of signal propagation
L+long response time+I already embedded the logic into the hardware+clock-dependent
Also VHDL is based because the acronym stands for another acronym
VHDL:
VHSIC
Hardware
Control
Linguini
dana 
