"She's everything. He's Just Ken."

Barbie = { Everything }

Ken ∈ Everything

∴ Barbie is Ken

Given that Barbie is everything and that Ken is a member of the set Everything, we therefore know that Barbie is Ken.

@LilahTovMoon I prefer the french poster

@Billboquet For those who haven't seen it, the French poster says "Elle peut tout faire. Lui, c’est juste Ken."

"c'est" sounds like "sait" (he knows) and "ken" is slang for "f*ck". So he just knows how to f*ck.

@LilahTovMoon there’s an excellent lesson in gender in here somewhere 
@LilahTovMoon Well at least Ken is Barbie.
@LilahTovMoon I like playing out the idea that in Barbie’s world everything is Barbie. So Ken is Barbie … and all the other possible genders and presentations not necessarily in the movie are Barbie too … My three adult daughters are going to see the Barbie movie this afternoon — will be fun to hear what they think.

@LilahTovMoon

In Barbie’s world Ken is like a skin tag on her neck. Visible, useless, and a slight annoyance.

@LilahTovMoon set theory works differently, right? If this conclusion is correct we could also conclude that every item of the set is identical (to both Barbie and Ken).

I also remember some trouble with sets containing themselves or not, so you might be on to something here either way.

@LilahTovMoon I think Barbie's beyond our Ken.
@LilahTovMoon Without Barbie, Ken is nothing
So, Ken - Barbie = 0
Therefore, Barbie is Ken

@LilahTovMoon Unfortunately I had a different interpretation... Ken is just a member of the set of everything, not the set itself. Barbie would be the set itself...

Ken is in Barbie.

@LilahTovMoon I spent way too much time on this stupid joke, here it’s your curse now
@LilahTovMoon great job everyone we solved gender