"She's everything. He's Just Ken."
Barbie = { Everything }
Ken ∈ Everything
∴ Barbie is Ken
Given that Barbie is everything and that Ken is a member of the set Everything, we therefore know that Barbie is Ken.
"She's everything. He's Just Ken."
Barbie = { Everything }
Ken ∈ Everything
∴ Barbie is Ken
Given that Barbie is everything and that Ken is a member of the set Everything, we therefore know that Barbie is Ken.
@Billboquet For those who haven't seen it, the French poster says "Elle peut tout faire. Lui, c’est juste Ken."
"c'est" sounds like "sait" (he knows) and "ken" is slang for "f*ck". So he just knows how to f*ck.

In Barbie’s world Ken is like a skin tag on her neck. Visible, useless, and a slight annoyance.
@LilahTovMoon set theory works differently, right? If this conclusion is correct we could also conclude that every item of the set is identical (to both Barbie and Ken).
I also remember some trouble with sets containing themselves or not, so you might be on to something here either way.
@LilahTovMoon Unfortunately I had a different interpretation... Ken is just a member of the set of everything, not the set itself. Barbie would be the set itself...
Ken is in Barbie.