@eniko Personally I do prefer renting. With ADHD and some other disabilities owning honestly seems like my worst nightmare, there's a high chance I'd ruin the place structurally just by not being able to like... get myself to employ someone else to do maintenance (and then get stuck with so much debt with nothing to show for it but more debt ey).
But there's a huge BUT there. Landlord can't throw me out. Landlord can't make large increases to rent. Other than like... structural changes we can do what we like with the place (paint, curtains, lighting, garden, flooring etc.). Landlord is responsible for fixing stuff and there's places we can go to to hold them accountable for it if they decide to be asses.
All of this is possible due to strict laws that are actually enforced, and honestly I'd prefer landlord not existing even with this structure. Just let it all be social housing. And even WITH those protections in place I'm still not going to ever rent from a singular landlord again. Either social or a company. (And in the country I'm currently in the cost of renting if you can't apply for social housing for whatever reason is so much that it's advised to just buy anyway if you're planning on staying somewhere for 5+ years. Mortgage is often cheaper.)
I've rented in other countries and in those contexts it's an instant "nope, buying is better" every single time because the freedom to just live is so restricted. It's stupid how different it is when there's halfway decent renters protection laws enforced.