@NoraReed yeah it's very gatekeepy. It was even worse in November during the first influx. It's gotten better which is more a testament to how bad it was than to say it's at all acceptable now.
I think it's legit to want nothing to do with threads but to sneer at threads users like I see so often is quite different, and troubling.
@NoraReed Yes. The sign-up and on-boarding process is poor, finding folks you know or that might interest you is poor, and the standard web user interface is… probably too complex for many folks new to the Fediverse to start out with.
Progressive disclosure on the website user interface would be a nice addition.
I’m not sure how automatically finding friends would work. There’s no social graph implemented around here, which is how Meta and other services can offer those recommendations.
Finding friends does work when you know names or such, but (confusingly) uses the search box.
I’ve found other ways to do some things that work for me, but the lack of a social graph and the lack of a generic search can be off-putting. (There are dolks that will claim the lack of search is a benefit, but less often included in those discussions is that the entire Fediverse firehose is ingested into various servers and indexed for who-knows-what purposes, which kinda makes the whole no-searches discussion seem kinda moot.)
For other client options for access the Fediverse, I’m using Tapbots Ivory, which is a client available for Apple devices, and that greatly simplifies the user interface.
@NoraReed There’s a reason Threads had so many signups. I’m a tech person, been doing programming and sysadmin work for over a decade now, but I also want social media to be easy to use.
Like, if I could just easily search and find everyone in one place, why wouldn’t I use that? Threaded replies don’t even work well all the time here with federation and all of that BS.
I like the fediverse and everything but I don’t want it to be a technical exercise to interact with and find people