I find myself wanting to contextualize the impact of gender-affirming care bans in a thread. I'm not writing a proper post on a Friday afternoon, Bluesky has reached a crisis point over moderation, Twitter feels death-throes-y to me, so I'm just going to post it here.

For reference, a judge in Kentucky just reluctantly reversed himself, allowing Kentucky's ban on gender affirming care to go into effect after the 6th circuit recently allowed a Tennessee law to.

https://substack.com/@chrisgeidner/note/c-19713769

Chris Geidner on Substack

BREAKING: Kentucky ban on gender-affirming care for minors can be enforced during appeal, judge rules. In fallout from last weekend’s ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals from the Sixth Circuit, the district court judge who earlier granted an injunction against Kentucky’s bans on gender-affirming care to minors on Friday issued a stay of his ruling pending appeal. Friday’s order means that Kentucky’s ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors is enforceable now. The 2-1 decision from the Sixth Circuit on July 8 granting Tennessee’s request for a stay pending appeal in the challenge to that state’s ban is precedent for all district court judges within the circuit — which includes Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan, in addition to Tennessee. U.S. District Judge David Hale concluded that Tennessee and Kentucky’s bans are too similar for him to deny Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron’s request to stay the injunction pending appeal, given the 2-1 decision from the Sixth Circuit granting Tennessee’s similar request for a stay pending appeal. The challengers to Kentucky’s ban argued that the Kentucky law and circumstances were different enough that Hale didn’t need to follow the Sixth Circuit’s Tennessee-law decision. Hale — while still maintaining that his injunction ruling is correct — ultimately decided that he had no basis to deny the stay request given the similarities between the laws and what the Sixth Circuit panel concluded about the key legal question for a stay: “Likelihood of success on the merits.”

Substack Notes

The three pieces of context I want to bring together are:

1. This impacts a tiny percentage of young people in the US.

2. Despite that, the damange being done to these kids is very high, and could be life threatening for some.

3. The full threat is much larger. There's a potential for precedents that could fundamentally change the relationship Americans have with medical care and place governments run by Christian zealots in the middle of deciding what medical treatments are allowed.

@e_urq I've been thinking about trans kids healthcare this week from a bit of a different angle. Sorry if this isn't very well-formed yet but I need to get it out of my brain somewhere...

Denying trans kids healthcare doesn't just make life hard for a few years while they wait it out. It doesn't just increase suicide risk temporarily. It creates depressed and suicidal adults.

When I look around the community lately I see so many trans folks struggling. So many trans girls, in particular, feeling like no amount of makeup in the world will ever wash off that man look. So many people of all genders suffering from decades of trauma related to being stuck in the wrong gender. So much pain and suffering all around.

Almost all of that (let's say 90%) could be alleviated if they had just been allowed to transition as kids. Some were denied healthcare, others were denied even the knowledge required to understand ourselves and come out. Sometimes by legislation or oppressive systems and sometimes by cultural pressure and bigotry. Whatever the reason, the result is the same. Millions of depressed adults who are struggling with just living life. You can think of it like any other treatable childhood disease that leaves people permanently disabled like polio. If we just let them transition, they would be happier adults who are able to better contribute and enrich our society, whatever your definition of that is.

Even if you look at it from a iron-cold economic point of view, it would be better to just give 'em the pills at 12 years old.

Preventing kids from transitioning is nothing but cruel. The whole point seems to be to prevent them from transitioning until the wrong hormones have done so much damage to their bodies that they give up on their dream. They may say "grow out of it" but we know that's not actually what happens. If your goal is a totally cis society, I guess that's one way to do it. 🙄 If, on the other hand, we want a happy and flourishing society, letting people live their best lives starting as kids is the only way to get there.

@faithisleaping @e_urq i don't think anyone should be laboring under the impression that the right wing are in any way interested in a happy, healthy society. That has never been one of their goals and they're pretty explicit about it.