Moderation, who does it better:
A) A company with millions of dollars in funding, and the backing of multiple investors with social media experience.
B) A handful of volunteer queers
Moderation, who does it better:
A) A company with millions of dollars in funding, and the backing of multiple investors with social media experience.
B) A handful of volunteer queers
@esdin I mean it also works because our mods *care*...
"We need to protect our community" vs "Extra effort in protecting this demographic will have good optics and lead to profit"
@esdin Ah, that's fair.
The weird thing for me is - isn't bluesky still in invite only mode?
You'd think they'd have moderators scaled to that, and slowed down to check if there's gaps in their moderation team.
@esdin @TindrasGrove @mike @soatok yup
salute the flag,
C) A handful of queers with clear and transparent guidelines for moderation and a "Break in case of Discourse/Drama Booze-requiring emergency" piggy bank that takes all donations not used to run the server... which keeps them around after whatever drama/discourse to update the aforementioned clear and transparent guidelines with new examples of what/not to do.
I've seen WAY too many meltdowns/implosions that were a result of "The [queer] admin and moderators wanted to run the server like "High School, but this time we're the popular kids" and the only thing that's was "good" about that was that the instance Suddenly Going Away in a Fit Of Pique was only PART of the network.