Biden is quietly reversing Trump’s sabotage of Obamacare

https://lemmy.world/post/1383407

Biden is quietly reversing Trump’s sabotage of Obamacare - LemmyWorld

Slowly but surely, President Biden is repairing the U.S. health-care system, reversing Trump-era sabotage and ensuring millions more Americans get access to affordable coverage. The latest of these efforts came on Friday, in a little-noticed but significant decision to protect Americans from junk health insurance. In 2017, Congress repeatedly tried and failed to repeal the Affordable Care Act. To casual observers, it might have looked like the end of the Republican fight to kill this lifesaving, inequality-fighting, newly popular law. It wasn’t. Over the next few years, President Donald Trump found new ways to sabotage the health-care system and its protections for the most vulnerable Americans. Among the most insidious of these backdoor repeal measures: expanding “short-term, limited duration” health plans — i.e., attempting to trick Americans into plans that looked cheap but basically covered nothing. Short-term plans are theoretically intended as brief, stopgap coverage — say, to tide over a new college grad whose job doesn’t start until the fall. They’re relatively unregulated; they don’t have to cover minimum care benefits guaranteed by Obamacare and other major legislation, for example. A 2018 analysis found that most don’t cover maternity services, substance-abuse care or prescription drugs. These plans can also deny coverage for care of preexisting conditions, even if the preexisting condition in question hadn’t yet been diagnosed at the time the person enrolled. People often don’t realize they’ve bought a worthless product until it’s too late — when they get hit by a bus, say, or are diagnosed with a brain tumor. Such loopholes might seem like no big deal until you find yourself falling through one. The Trump administration made sure more people did by allowing these allegedly short-term plans to last as long as 364 days, rather than the three-month max that had been in place, and to be renewed for up to three years. This made them look a whole lot like regular plans. Plus, because short-term plans are mega-profitable for insurers, brokers can get much larger commissions for steering hapless customers into them. So, many did. Exactly how many were lured by this policy change is unclear; the data is lousy, precisely because these products are so unregulated. A recent estimate from the Urban Institute ballparked the number of people enrolled in individual plans that are noncompliant with Obamacare protections at 2.5 million. The proliferation of short-term junk plans affects even consumers who don’t get duped by them. That’s because these cheaper plans disproportionately siphon healthier (i.e., lower-cost) people out of the broader individual insurance marketplaces. People who have chronic conditions or otherwise know they will need more substantial coverage are more likely to stay in the regular marketplace pool, driving premiums there ever higher. Last week, however, the Biden administration announced a rollback of this Trump-era expansion of short-term health plans. In a proposed rule, Biden officials said those already in these skimpy Trump-blessed plans can continue in them, if they so choose. (“There were some hard lessons learned from the ‘if you like your plan you can keep it’ blowback a decade ago,” surmises Georgetown University health scholar Sabrina Corlette.) But going forward, any new “short-term, limited duration” plans would need to be truly short-term (up to three months) and truly limited-duration (renewed for up to one additional month only). Critically, short-term plans must also provide clearer language about what care they do and don’t cover, and under what circumstances. People who choose to buy junk must know upfront that they’re buying junk. The White House has marketed this rule as part of “Bidenomics,” though it might be more easily understood as simply pro-consumer. It also dovetails nicely with other actions the administration has taken to expand access to coverage, including outreach to encourage eligible Americans to enroll in marketplace plans and patching the so-called family glitch (a regulatory accident that had blocked a lot of families from accessing subsidized health coverage). Most important, through last summer’s Inflation Reduction Act, Biden extended the enhanced premium tax credits available for plans on the individual marketplace. This has meant that millions more Americans can get solid health-care coverage that not only is affordable but also, in many cases, has an out-of-pocket premium of zero dollars. And unlike with those junk insurance plans, the low price tag here isn’t a red flag; these plans actually do provide comprehensive coverage, including for people with preexisting conditions. It’s not a bait-and-switch. It’s a real subsidy — and one that will likely drive down premiums overall, on average, by drawing more healthy people into the broader marketplace risk pool. Our health-care system is still kludgy. It still allows too many Americans to fall through the cracks. But small unsung fixes such as this are achievements worth celebrating.

Since I have a Washington Post subscription I try and share the body for the community since it is behind a paywall.
Doing God’s work
Another way to achieve this is to share an archived link, like this: https://archive.md/ZbSKJ
Not every post is published, though most are.

You can archive links yourself that aren’t published in the archive yet here

archive.ph

archive.ph

Democracy dies behind a paywall. Thank you.
But it needs a massive overhaul, as in public healthcare. What Obama did was not enough.
I’ll celebrate when we have universal healthcare, until then it’s just bs to me.

The perfect is the enemy of the good. We are not going straight to universal health care. That's just not happening.

We can take steps towards it though, until we eventually get they're.

Every other country has it. It can’t be that hard.
I, too, will celebrate when we have universal healthcare, until then it’s a way for my sister to have good, routine follow-up care for her unexpected cancer diagnosis and for me to be able to purchase comprehensive healthcare on the open market, as I’m an independent contractor and don’t work for a corporation with leverage to get private insurance.
That said, there’s a surgical procedure which would enhance my quality of life significantly and greatly reduce my level of discomfort, but my insurance, and it’s good insurance, refuses to pay for it. I don’t have $25,000 to spend out of pocket, so I’m pretty fucked.
That perspective changes quickly when you or a loved one rely on it. I was able to get free medical care with Missouri paying for it thanks to the ACA.
What Congress did while Obama was President wasn’t enough. Obama didn’t get everything he wanted for the ACA.
You can thank fuckheads like Joe Lieberman for kneecapping it.
The corporate propaganda blitz during the so-called “healthcare debate” was insane. Democrats wanted to do a lot more, but the people who make tons of money screwing everyone over were, of course, very upset about it and managed to manipulate public opinion effectively. Crap like “government death panels!” was taken seriously, as of there aren’t already corporate death labels and this huge bureaucracy that fights with you and your doctors about what care to provide. There was a large block of people who had decent healthcare and didn’t gaf about anyone else or understand how even if they’re “satisfied with their plan”, it could be improved. Crazy that people actual support a system where you can lose your house and go bankrupt for one serious medical incident.

Listen to this podcast

Frame Canada: Wendell Potter spent decades scaring Americans. About Canada. He worked for the health insurance industry, and he knew that if Americans understood Canadian-style health care, they might… like it. So he helped deploy an industry playbook for protecting the health insurance agency. www.npr.org/2020/10/19/925354134/frame-canada

Most of those democrats no doubt also accepted ‘donations’ from those same companies.

Michael Moore’s movie Sicko showed a video of all these politicians and he put the amount of healthcare lobbying money over each of their heads.

Hillary Clinton also accepted lobbying money from healthcare companies, and her team tried to talk Moore out of mentioning it.

Progress is still progress, even if it’s just slow incremental work to move back to pre-Trump norms.
2016 was the turning point of me being a stupid and proud “Non-voter” to being a loud and proud voter. If I have to thank Trump for anything, it’s for showing me how stupid our society is and we need to do everything we can to undo the damages he has wrought.

I thought the 2008 election was the wakeup call the republican party needed to realize how badly they need to modernize and reform. I got complacent and stopped paying attention to politics. God how wrong I was :/

I had my 2016 absentee ballot on my desk for a month meaning to mail it out, and didn’t get it out until the day before the election. Not sure if it was counted. I still feel bad about that and accept my share of responsibility for what happened next.

When’s he planning on undoing the sabotage done by Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman?
The only entity that should be paying for healthcare is the government. And if you don’t think your taxes should go to keeping other people healthy, you don’t understand how diseases work. They don’t care how rich or poor you are.
Healthy people make a healthy society. That in turn makes a healthy, stronger country. Very simple to understand. This is why the United States will never do the right thing. Just like gun control.

Not quite like gun control, but I get what you’re saying.

Tell the protestors in Iran about the value of gun control, lol.

I think you’re conflating “gun control” with “taking away all the guns.” No reasonable person is advocating for taking away all the guns, so it’s not a reasonable assumption that “gun control” equals “take away all the guns.”
Good point. I think a lot of “gun control” advocates’ end goal is to take away all guns.
If that’s the conspiracy theory you want to subscribe to, I can’t stop you I guess.

And if you don’t think your taxes should go to keeping other people healthy

Kind of funny that the people who are against their tax dollars paying for other people’s healthcare are ok with their insurance premiums paying for other people’s healthcare. It really shows that it’s all about partisanship and propaganda more than anything.

Holy shit, I lean pretty solid left, but damn this is some propaganda. I’ll start by saying that I truly believe that our country should provide universal healthcare, but the ACA ain’t it. I work in health insurance and the ACA plans have significantly more problems than any “junk” plans out there. Here’s a few examples from personal experience:

  • Inaccurate provider directory - ACA carriers may show a doctor/hospital as in network during the open enrollment period, then 3 or 4 months later when the person goes to use the plan they find out the directory was wrong. At that point, since we’re outside of the open enrollment period they are basically screwed and have to pay out of pocket to continue to use their preferred facilities.

  • Customer service - good luck getting someone from any ACA carrier on the phone. Any time there is an issue it’s a jerk around fest getting someone that has any ability to help whatsoever.

  • Network - Good luck trying to get coverage if you’re traveling out of state and have an accident or get sick and need to see a doctor. You just flat out can’t use it

  • Network part 2 - The vast majority of plans are either HMO or EPO. Let’s say you’re on an HMO and have a health condition where you need to see a specialist regularly. You need to go to your primary care for a referral EVERY SINGLE TIME you need to go to that specialist. With EPO’s you can skip that referral step, but good luck getting an appointment in any sort of reasonable timeframe. It usually takes 3-6 months to get in for your first visit, and that’s just about every time you need to see that specialist.

  • Network part 3 - None of the top facilities accept any ACA plans. Say you get cancer and want to go to the Cleveland Clinic as they are the best at what they do. Flat out can’t go there, they don’t take it. This goes for Cleveland Clinic, Mercy, Baptist, DiMaggio, etc.

  • Dropping coverage - Carriers will drop your coverage out of nowhere with no explanation or notice they are doing so. The individual only finds out when they go to use the policy, and they’d better hope that they’re not trying to use it for anything serious cuz the carrier/marketplace will do absolutely nothing to help you.

  • Step Therapy - Let’s say you take an expensive specialty medication that is the only thing that provides any relief from your health condition. Well, every single time the calendar flips to a new year you have to go through Step Therapy. That means that you have to try a genetic medication and prove it doesn’t work. Then you have to try a brand medication and prove it doesn’t work. Then you can maybe get your specialty drug, but only if it’s on the carrier formulary.

  • Insolvency - Each of the past two years there has been an ACA carrier that has gone belly up. Last year it was Bright Health, this year it’s Friday Health. Imagine picking a plan, going through the hoops of finding a doctor that actually takes it, meeting some or all of your deductible, and then the carrier disappears mid year. You’ve just all of the money you’ve contributed and have to start the entire process over again. Yeesh. I didn’t know it was possible for any insurance company to go out of business, but 2 years in a row it’s happened.

  • Unnecessary Coverage - Does a 60yo woman really need maternity? Does someone that’s never been to nor ever intends to go to a psych need mental health coverage? Does someone that has never taken a drug or drank alcohol in their life need substance abuse coverage? Those are rhetorical questions, but the answer is an overwhelming no. Yet they have to pay to have that as part of their plans even if they’ll never use it.

There’s a lot more that I could list but these are the major ones that come to mind right off the bat.

Look, our health insurance system is fucking terrible across the board, whether it’s ACA or anything else or there… Healthy people that want a nationwide PPO with lower premiums and access to the best facilities in the country should be able to purchase those plans. Removing choice is not the way to fix our system.

I’ll tell you right now, the people that are on short term plans generally love them, and the people on ACA plans generally hate them. This is just going to push people to even shittier fixed inventory or cost share plans which are the worst things out there.

The real reason this is happening is that only the sick and low income individuals are on ACA plans. There’s not enough healthy people to subsidize the cost of treatment for others. Let’s make the ACA better instead of making our options worse.

Wow, thank you so much for taking the time to write all this. I am not familiar with the inner workings of the ACA and this is very insightful. Same as you, I’m all for universal healthcare, but not at the expense of the patients. What a time to be alive.

Sure, a ton of the Obamacare plans are straight up awful or a waste of money, but the Medicaid expansion was really good (for the states that accepted it). The singular portal for applying for Medicaid is also a vast improvement, simplifying things for patients in general. As you said, the health insurance system is terrible across the board, ACA plan or not; the only real way to change that is to have a public option at minimum.

Yeah, the title “Biden is quietly reversing…” etc feels like Biden’s playing whackamole while someone is literally dying of a heart attack next to him. But the ACA did more than just establish the ACA Marketplace.

a ton of the Obamacare plans are straight up awful or a waste of money,

All ACA plans have the same basic coverage. That’s how the law works. That is one of the great advantages, is that you don’t have too closely study the fine print, cross your fingers, and pray to Moluch that you will get the things covered that you need. The main difference is deductable and premium cost.

I mean, I think deductibles and premium costs matter a lot, don’t you? A lot of people don’t really understand those things, and it can be a shock to find you have to pay a $2000 deductible before any kind of insurance kicks in.
So what is the solution? Scrap ACA entirely, modify it, improve it, something else? I feel like a public option that is reasonably priced to compete with private insurers and providers is a more actionable option. Disclaimer though, I fully admit I don’t understand healthcare or insurance AT ALL and I only skimmed your post, sorry.

Scrap it entirely and do what the rest of the civilized world does and provide universal healthcare with the ability to supplement with private insurance. That’ll put me basically out of a job, but that’s what needs to be done.

My true solution would be the government offering everyone a social safety net for catastrophic events, something like a $20,000 cap on medical bills lifetime, and then pay cash for everything else. That way doctors and hospitals will actually have to compete for our business, true free market, where the quality of service will increase while out of pocket costs decrease. The only area of healthcare where this has happened is with elective services (lasik, tits & ass, lipo, etc) because the doctors are competing for your business. For people with health conditions have them apply for Medicaid.

That way doctors and hospitals will actually have to compete for our business, true free market, where the quality of service will increase while out of pocket costs decrease.

European chiming in here, which explains my totally communist/socialist viewpoint, I call bullshit. There is no healthcare ‘market’. When a person falls ill, they have no time/energy to seek out the highest quality/most cost-effective hospital or healthcare professionals. They turn to the one that is closest by and specialised in their ailment.

Just like there are no markets for housing, energy, water, public transport and all the other public services that just require deep public investments. These services do not need to make a profit, precisely because profit seeking takes away the investment capacity. This seems to be so hard to understand for folks in the US, I guess the decades long propaganda has taken its toll.

And yes, if one needs a lipo or a breast implant… For sure, that’s a market. As these are completely unnecessary, demand based services.

When a person falls ill, they have no time/energy to seek out the highest quality/most cost-effective hospital or healthcare professionals. They turn to the one that is closest by and specialised in their ailment.

I’m not referring to issues that require immediate attention. Of course if you need to get something taken care of right away you can utilize the public health insurance to get that taken care of. On top of that, with the type of system I suggest, there wouldn’t be a need to “price shop” as the market would drive prices down and determine a standardized cost of service. If you get sick and go to a doctor and get charged some price that is above market standard, you’re sure to remember that and go to a different facility the next time around.

These services do not need to make a profit, precisely because profit seeking takes away the investment capacity.

I am of the firm opinion that health insurance carriers should be not-for-profit companies, I definitely agree with you on this.

The left needs to pool some money together and create a new insurer. Create a network of doctors that’ll work below market rate (but not obscenely so), and make sure the organisation is eligible for debt forgiveness under the PSLF.

Only prescribe generic medicines, focus on preventative medicine and diet as much as possible, do all the stuff government run systems do elsewhere.

Dropping coverage - Carriers will drop your coverage out of nowhere

Under the ACA that is not allowed. But they can drop you if you have short term junk insurance.

the people on ACA plans generally hate them.

I was on for 2 years and it was pretty good. They had the best drug plan ever. Most drugs cost me $0. Even ones that normally cost $100+ in other plans.

The real reason this is happening is that only the sick and low income individuals are on ACA plans.

Bullshit. Anyone who (1) is not in an employer plan and (2) does not want junk insurance with bad coverage has these plans and is very glad to have them.

Well, every single time the calendar flips to a new year you have to go through Step Therapy.

This does not happen unless you choose a different insurance. Same as employer insurance or your junk insurance.

Does a 60 year old woman really need maternity?

A 60 year old woman never pays for “maternity”. Plans price their premium by age. They know a 60 year woman won’t need maternity, but will need a lot of other expensive coverage a 30 year old probably won’t. Therefore, the 60 year old woman is charged a ridiculous rate.

Insolvency

Less likely for ACA

Customer service

I had great customer service on ACA.

You listed 9 things and only 1 out of 9 (network coverage) was a real issue specific to ACA. And that is just because the plans are new.

Let’s make the ACA better

Well sure. Subsidies should be increased etc. Better yet, Medicare for All.

Upvote for answering and refuting, that’s the best way to learn and understand the reality of shit. It’s late and I will be back in the am with a reply

Downvote, because it’s not just that I disagree with pretty much every point, but any time someone restore to victim blaming

If someone ends up with a “junk” plan that means that they did not do their research

It’s one thing to do research and weigh options to determine the best out of multiple reasonable choices, but not whether you’re getting ripped off or not. Are we really ok with health insurance being similar to email from a “Nigerian Prince”?

It’s victim blaming to suggest someone should make an informed decision when it comes to something as important as their healthcare?

I’m copying from another one of my comments

The tools exist. Google.com, brochures, carrier websites, policy documents, member portals. There are multiple ways to look into the things that are being offered to you, and multiple ways to review the policy after the fact.

I’ve never offered a client a policy that was not a good fit for them. It screws them over and makes my job harder. Agents have to be licensed to offer policies, with a 20 hours continuing education course every 24 months, annual ACA compliance certifications, $1 million error and omission insurance. There are also very accessible avenues to report bad actors, and complaints are taken very seriously by the department of insurance. I wish the police had as much scrutiny to to wear a badge as health agents have to carry a license. Nobody is in this career to fuck people over, it’s too easy to lose your license and your livelihood.

The whole issue of “junk plans” is completely overblown. I said it in a previous comment, this change isn’t to protect consumers, it’s to eliminate the ability for healthy people to go with anything other than employer or ACA coverage (which both happen to be offered by the same barriers btw). The marketplace carriers NEED healthy people to start buying plans, otherwise the whole thing is going to fall apart. There’s just currently way too many claims in proportion to the total number of insured. The carriers cannot survive this much longer.

I love how absolutely tone deaf and American this take is. we shouldn’t give people the tools to help prevent issues, instead we should blame them when they make decisions based on information that _wasnt_ provided to them

The tools exist. Google.com, brochures, carrier websites, policy documents, member portals. There are multiple ways to look into the things that are being offered to you, and multiple ways to review the policy after the fact.

I’ve never offered a client a policy that was not a good fit for them. It screws them over and makes my job harder. Agents have to be licensed to offer policies, with a20 hours continuing education course every 24 months, annual ACA compliance certifications, $1 million error and omission insurance. There are also very accessible avenues to report bad actors, and complaints are taken very seriously by the department of insurance. I wish the police had as strict of requirements to provide “law and order” as health agents do. Nobody is in this career to fuck people over, it’s too easy to lose your license and your livelihood.

The whole issue of “junk plans” is completely overblown. I said it in a previous comment, this change isn’t to protect consumers, it’s to eliminate the ability for healthy people to go with anything other than employer or ACA coverage (which both happen to be offered by the same barriers btw). The marketplace carriers NEED healthy people to start buying plans, otherwise the whole thing is going to fall apart. There’s just currently way too many claims in proportion to the total number of insured. The carriers cannot survive this much longer.

The only way to repair the US healthcare system is to ban the for-profit, rapaciace, mafia middle men that are private insurance companies with a single payer system. Anything less than that is not repairing anything, it’s just prolonging the broken system.

Isn’t all privatized healthcare junk healthcare? I mean, it’s tied to an employer, you pay for coverage and depending on your plan, you still have to pay thousands of dollars before it really kicks in and then they still won’t cover 100%, and insurance can still deny your surgery or procedure, and meds are still expensive as hell.

I got into a debate with a vet about socialized healthcare and I told him the military is a form of socialism with socialized healthcare. They get free meals if they eat at the dfac. Vets and dependents get free healthcare and basically free meds. It’s all paid for by the military, which gets money from the government. They still have insurance, but it basically covers everything, even at civilian hospitals. Sure, you have to sign on and possibly go to war, but if/when you come back, you don’t have to worry about healthcare.

It’s definitely possible to do, since the US is the only first world country to not have it. We just refuse to do it because we care more about corporations than people.

I’ve always said if you don’t go to college you should be required to do a two year stint in the military. You can take a non-combat role, they will teach you professionalism and a trade, get access to the GI bill and Tricare, etc.

It could be a good safety net for people.

That sounds like a good way to get a lot of people who aren’t very bright into the military and their standards are already low enough.
The military already specifically targets low education regions for recruitment
It’s still crap but beats not having an insurance.
I have always been wanting to ask: here in Pakistan we have government hospitals. Sure the supply is skimpy and the patients are too many but it’s totally free. Why doesn’t America have something like that?
Pure greed. :-(
Too corporate and not very keen on helping people ig. They have the funds that they are wasting anyway but nope

There’s a few public hospitals and there is a law that mandates if you show up in emergency room they have to provide you with emergency care, although they can bill you for it.

But yes it is very lame and peculiar that the United States is basically the only major industrialized nation that doesn’t have some kind of centralized universal health care plan where everyone is automatically opted in.

It’s disgusting, and it’s also grossly inefficient with a third of our cost going to paperwork and we spend 20% of our GDMP on health care when the average OECD nation spends about 10% and covers everybody.

Wow, you guys really need to sort your medical out. What’s shameful is that what you’re telling me sound like problems that everyone would be aware of increasing their demand to be fixed but nothing has been happening, or as I understand it if something good does happen then shitty people like Trump mess it up.
Unfortunately half of our voters are morons who enable this because they can be guided by republican lawmakers into prioritizing bs issues instead
Totally. They sabotage people’s needs but people still vote for them cuz “Trump has a plan.”