Have you ever edited #Wikipedia? 
(Boost for some reach? π₯Ί)
Have you ever edited #Wikipedia? 
(Boost for some reach? π₯Ί)
Speaking of. I tried to edit an old version of the website for this international research organization I write news on, when I saw it had an outdated logo from 2010 or so. Nobody had updated anything (they are all scientific researchers in solar techs, probably don't care about wikipedia)and Wikipedia had a notice on it, saying "Hey, lovely onlooker, won't please
@theresnotime @MiaWinter
...kindly update this sad old thing" and I blundered into it saying yes I know quite a bit about this topic as I've interviewed most of these guys gone to their conferences and so on.
They came down on me like a ton a bricks! "How dare you shill for your little blog!!!" (This international org is under the IEA...) You are blocked for eternity!!!"
and so the site is gone and "you may never darken our door again!!"
[mentionuserid="56c2718d-9aa5-453a-980a-cdadc104875e"] wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone in black mesa can edit?
@theresnotime it took me a bit of time to realize that "edit" means more than just "fix typos and obvious incorrect/outdated information". I've had it similarly with open source, but it took me less time.
but yeah, realizing that even stuff like "this language version does not indicate she's a corrupt [redacted]" is something I *can* and even *should* fix *myself*, kinda blew my mind


@theresnotime yes but any edits got yeeted by a Swiss "Men's Rights Activist" including appeals and discussion of the edits.
Never bothered since then...
@theresnotime
I was editing a page about Generative Art. There was a section of relevant websites and software.
WK Editor reproached me for adding a link to my (free) software. They removed my edit.
But in the links, they had no problem leaving a link to a commercial company who sells online training.
That was a slap in the face for me.
( β¬οΈ )
So:
- You work on a subject, so you know well the topic.
- you add a link RELEVANT to the topic (to a non-commercial website).
- you get kicked because it's YOUR website.
Errr... of course it's my website. This is were I publish my projects.
Duh.
(PS: There are ZERO ads on my website. and I sell nothing.)
Basically, they didn't even CHECK if the added information was relevant to the topic.
They saw that the URL was ressembling my wikipedia pseudo, so they just blocked everything from me.
@theresnotime
Oh they were not interested in talking. This was a "no".
This makes me wonder how much information gets pushed back just because editors don't even CHECK if the information is revelant (which... well.. should be the main concern).
(And how many good wills totally abandon Wikipedia edition because of this.)
@sebsauvage @theresnotime I've seen it happen with Paul McKenney on the RCU page. It wasn't pretty.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Read-copy-update
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PaulMcKenney
Iβve come across this as well. It seems they think a second hand source of information is better than a first hand source. In this case, if someone else mentioned your free product it would be worth something, but not you touting your own stuff.
In your case itβs silly, but I can understand their position.
@theresnotime And @openstreetmap as well!
And gotten several fixes for local shared use paths in to google maps
:)