

@KinkyKobolds @jackemled People.
Keep.
Saying.
That.
Please fuck off. It doesn't mean that in furry, I do not have "human-like sapience", /hi I'm a wolf and not humanlike at all/, "sapience" isn't a fucking Special Human Thing, and just... no.
Don't try to REDEFINE "anthro" to include me and go "oh it's okay!".
@IceWolf @KinkyKobolds @jackemled I think that was the original definition in the furry fandom. And the basis of the name for AnthroCon too.
It is quite ok to try to redefine it back to the roots. As for now, it seems "furry fandom" is a "for people that like to dress up as animals" fandom, so it is ok to look at how it was when it started and try to "redefine" it back to what it was.
Therians were also a much bigger part of it back then, not shunned like it often is now.
@panduck @KinkyKobolds @jackemled Therians being more accepted is cool, but the "so you're anthro so anthronormativity is okay!" is NOT.
Fucking /stop it./
@IceWolf @KinkyKobolds @jackemled Well, I have been in this fandom for over 30 years, my main character is just a plain osprey I still consider anthro because they can talk, and while it is completely up to you to define yourself as anthro / non anthro, I am sure not gonna stop referring to my plain-bird-self as anthro and I have no intentions to change that...
You attacked the name AnthroCon. It is then a bit more than how you define yourself. You don't own the definition.