The #Fediverse’s worries over #Threads allowing abusive behaviour to spill over to networks here would also be a problem for Threads » Tumblr » Twitter if any of these federated.

On existing fediverse or #mastodon instances that would be overwhelming,

For large commercial to commercial instances what would it be? A reason to share resource or develop collaborative strategies against abuse?

Or simply imposition of external moderation costs? Incentive to defederate?

@jim I'm not sure how much "collaboration" there can be, when one side has already unilaterally decreed they will do certain things whether you like it or not.

For example, "if you're building safety classifiers, you need to be able to run those classifiers" https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/5/23784870/instagram-threads-adam-mosseri-interview-twitter-competitor likely means anything you send Instagram's way will be fed into #PhotoDNA or similar.

Instagram Threads: why Meta is competing with Twitter

The “volatility” of Twitter under Elon Musk’s ownership has given Meta an opening to compete with its new app Threads, says the head of Instagram, Adam Mosseri.

The Verge
@nemobis What a platform does within its platform is one thing, probably you have to accept it. The question I am asking is how for example Tumblr would react to a large number of abusive Threads users causing problems on Tumblr's own platform.

@jim Ah. Yes, that's going to be interesting to watch...

#Automattic is already on the #GIFCT so I presume they'd be sharing some content recognition databases.
https://gifct.org/membership/

Other than that I guess it will be a game of cat and mouse as with the antispam measures adopted by the largest email providers who can't outright disconnect from each other (as they do with smaller players)?

Membership | GIFCT

GIFCT