@atokin
That is actually quite simple. All of the "hottest" services on the internet started collecting them and people just ignored it or considered it the price of doing business with the "hottest" services that everyone who is someone or everyone who wants to be someone is on.
Sad statement of the human condition. :(
"Please hold still while your computer takes a retinal scan and digitizes the genetic sample you have provided."
If Meta is to successfully interfere in elections, again, especially on Russia's behalf, it needs a complete data set to sell to hostile foreign nations.
Facebook can't understand why people might want to keep democracy and why they have reservations about enriching billionaires and social media plutocrats.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Analytica_data_scandal
The lawsuits are just "cost of doing business" penalties to Meta.
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2022/12/23/facebook-parent-meta-to-pay-725m-in-cambridge-analytica-scandal
@breadandwater @protonmail
Not really. The app is collecting it at the device itself instead of from the internet ingress point.
Yes, AdGuard can provide some protections, but not much at all. :(
@breadandwater @protonmail
Not sure you level of Tech understanding so I apologize if this is too simplistic, but...
The app will collect the data and make it part of the app's communication with the Threads server. Since it is internal to the connection, tools like VPNs will not even see it, while tools like AdGuard are unable to insert themselves into the outbound communication they can't intercept and "replace" incoming "undesired" data.
@nikatjef saw the latest update by AdGuard on GitHub includes in-app tracker blocking. Not sure how well it works if at all
“AdGuard v4.5 for iOS now includes system-wide tracking protection, which allows you to block in-app trackers that can discreetly collect user data”
@arh @protonmail
Well considering that FB and IG were basically collecting that data before they were required to tell you about it, no not really. And this is why I think it really will end up becoming the Twitter killer... FB and IG users already give this information to Meta, so there is really no new "cost" to the end users.
In all honesty it is not worse than FB and IG, it is just more visible now, so people are aware of it.
@arh @protonmail that’s one way of looking at it , i want to add why people go with “good cop bad cop” between twitter and facebook when both probably do the samething
Facebook is more upfront about it
Here's a video rundown of all permissions that #Threads app is requiring: https://tilvids.com/w/3Fq67yoxjsi9mnSKG2Xbam
It's greasly.
@protonmail I'm not sure which one freaks me the most: the financial info or the health and fitness, or the browsing history.
Advice for anyone: STAY AWAY FROM IT.
I heard it's even worse... D:
It is abomination….creepy beyond words.