If Jack Dorsey & Elon Musk (who are friends) merely wanted to run a MAGA site full of fascists, they could have just bought Parler & saved themselves approx 43.999 billion dollars.

What they wanted was to cripple the sad remnants of investigative journalism, and the political left, which successfully used Twitter for political organizing, activism & messaging throughout the Trump regime.

Why would anyone who cares about either of these things go to Jack's #Bluesky project.

Amid rumors he was being forced out as Twitter CEO (for the 2nd time), Dorsey reached out to Musk, & together they planned his takeover, which Dorsey backed to the tune of $1 billion in shares. Jack said he planned this exit starting in 2020, which is also when he started publicly making friends with Musk.

He is one of the biggest owners of Twitter.

As Dave Troy noted in Oct 2022: They're collaborators, not competitors.

https://progressives.social/@chargrille/110649546742614799

Erin Conroy (@[email protected])

Attached: 4 images @[email protected] June 11, 2022: Jack: "Twitter Inc could also use [Bluesky] as foundation." "According to the filing, Dorsey and Musk “may be deemed to have formed a group” for the purposes of part of the filing, a designation that indicates the pair were working together on the buyout." Oct. 18, 2022: Q: You've talked about a protocol for Twitter...is this along those lines? jack @jack: yes https://www.ft.com/content/f65414c4-f3e4-4bff-9af0-4960f922ce1d

Mastodon progressives

A Jack Dorsey owned protocol or platform will never, *ever* be a safe space for Democratic or progressive organizing, or even a safe gathering space for any marginalized community (which includes women).

It's actually a big deal to throw away this moment - an opening of possibility to meaningfully disrupt the cycle of Enshittification & to build a vastly more democratic social media space.

Musk won't prevail in any misappropriation claims against #Meta for #Threads because he hasn't tried to enforce against #Bluesky, which directly competes with Twitter, hired Twitter employees & all 3 of its Board members worked at Twitter. BS's clearly been using information acquired at Twitter to accelerate its development. Its attraction to users is b/c it's a copycat clone of Twitter - but Musk has never made a peep about it. And never will.

Tells you something very important about Bluesky

Failure to protect against misappropriation is an affirmative defense in CA.

Dorsey had duty to keep Twitter's TSs. "It is misappropriation to disclose or use another’s trade secret, knowing or having reason to know, that...the trade secret was acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain its secrecy or limit its use, or was derived from or through a person who owed a duty to maintain its secrecy or limit its use. (Cal. Civ. Code, §§ 3426.1(b)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii).)"

Really looking forward to all the people who've been spreading unsourced reassurances that there is ABSOLUTELY NO collusive relationship between Dorsey's #Bluesky project & Musk's #Twitter, suddenly now spreading the opposite rumor that Bluesky & Twitter have contractual agreements & that's why Musk has never treated "totally independent" Bluesky the way he treats every other competitor to Twitter (a company which his buddy & Twitter takeover co-conspirator Jack Dorsey still owns $1 billion of).
Anyway, I am truly grateful that Quinn Emanuel got paid by Elon Musk to open up this can of worms and I hope it means some journalists might wake up and do their jobs.