@lightweight
> Investor State Dispute Services (ISDS) terms of the not-at-all Free Trade Agreement our gov't has signed us up to...this will help you understand how bad it is
When the NatLabs talk about defending the "rules-based international order", this is what they're talking about. China is not exceptional in its economic colonisation of smaller/ weaker countries through "aid". Corporate media is just more honest about it when they do it.
Reading Snowcrash is another aid to understanding where we've been heading since the NeoLiberal coups, and where we might end up if we don't change direction. We need to cooperate on a massive scale to defend and extend democracy (by the broadest possible definition - see David Graeber's book The Democracy Project).
@isaacfreeman @strypey @lightweight @DrCuriosity I liked the idea of the phyles in Diamond Age. What about them do you see as fascist?
(Except in the old-style literal sense that people are stronger in groups.)
@isaacfreeman @strypey @lightweight @DrCuriosity
Is it fair to say you're describing some of the larger phyles in Diamond Age as having a kind of nostalgia for past glory and restrictive-but-overall-stable social structure that you associate with fascism? That you're not saying all phyles are necessarily fashy, but the bigger ones we saw seemed that way?
It's a good while since I last read it, but I saw a phyle like the Ashanti as a group offering mutual support.
@alix @strypey @lightweight @DrCuriosity Perfectly fair. There are lots of phyles with different worldviews, but the NeoVictorians seemed to be particularly influential globally, and the Confucians in China. It could be just the viewpoint of the characters, but I assumed that most phyles would have had similarly reactionary origins.
Also could be just me and my memory.