This is precisely the behaviour I describe as inevitable in https://davelane.nz/megacorps ... but no one in the 'halls of power' seems to understand this.
@version The Greens seem to understand the erosions of our sovereignty that things like ISDS entail better than most, which is why they strongly opposed the (CP)TPPA deal going through.
They're not quite as focused on the information technology systems side of things and how our digital sovereignty is impacted, but they still seem to be the best of a bad lot in terms of NZ political parties opposing this kind of provision.
And the behaviour expected of them too, to the benefit of the few:
https://masto.ai/@rbreich/110623611866436564
A General Mills exec admitted to “getting smart about how we look at pricing.” Its net income increased 16% to $2.7 billion in FY 2022. Meanwhile, the company spent over $2.12 billion on shareholder handouts. When I say price gouging is driving inflation, this is what I mean. https://accountable.us/analysis-these-sp-500-companies-inflated-prices-despite-bigger-profits-and-investor-handouts/
@lightweight
The interview mentions the way "aid" and "development" are used as tools of corporate colonisation in poorer companies. So are states.
This masters thesis explores anarchism and permaculture as an alternative to both.
'An Alternative to Development Framework: A Study of Permaculture and Anarchism in Global Justice Movements in New Zealand'
#TaziaGaisford, 2010
This study is a response to calls for alternatives to development by postdevelopment authors and critics of post-development alike. It asks “can the praxis of permaculture and anarchism provide an alternative to development?” Although alternatives to development arguably do not exist untouched by the dominant development paradigm, it is possible to imagine and to create the different possible organisations based on principles of mutual aid, direct action and self-management. Anarchism as a politically focused social philosophy and permaculture as an ecologically focused design philosophy are mutually beneficial in strengthening each other. The combined analysis of alternatives to development uses case studies in the Wellington Region, primarily Climate Camp Aotearoa, with permaculture and anarchist principles, and contributes another perspective to the post-development debate. The two approaches share converging central ethics, principles and struggles of praxis. They recognise that transformative change is necessary. Whether it is called a cultural revolution, transition or paradigm shift, the underlying recognition is that we need to live more harmoniously with each other and the natural environment by creating diverse post-industrial societies. Many tools, principles and processes advocated by alternative development and post-development are the same. However, the combination of those tools, principles and processes, and how they are designed and applied in relation to each other systemically, are significant in determining whether or not the intent is that of an alternative to development. Solidarity and stewardship, decentralisation and autonomy, tight multiple feedback mechanisms and a whole system design approach are some of the alternative people-focused solutions proposed by anarchism and permaculture. Fieldwork research was conducted using the qualitative ethnographic and action research methods of participant observation from a constructionist and post-development perspective. Global justice networks are given importance as examples of the anarchistic intent of alternatives to development.
@lightweight
> Investor State Dispute Services (ISDS) terms of the not-at-all Free Trade Agreement our gov't has signed us up to...this will help you understand how bad it is
When the NatLabs talk about defending the "rules-based international order", this is what they're talking about. China is not exceptional in its economic colonisation of smaller/ weaker countries through "aid". Corporate media is just more honest about it when they do it.
Reading Snowcrash is another aid to understanding where we've been heading since the NeoLiberal coups, and where we might end up if we don't change direction. We need to cooperate on a massive scale to defend and extend democracy (by the broadest possible definition - see David Graeber's book The Democracy Project).
@isaacfreeman @strypey @lightweight @DrCuriosity I liked the idea of the phyles in Diamond Age. What about them do you see as fascist?
(Except in the old-style literal sense that people are stronger in groups.)
@lightweight @alix @strypey @DrCuriosity Yeah, it’s a great book. I don’t think I’ve re-read it for a similar amount of time, so this is my recollection.
I’ve found later work by Stephenson less interesting. My impression is that he used to hang out with Greenpeace people, but now it’s mainly just techbros.
@alix @strypey @lightweight @DrCuriosity Many of the other phyles mentioned seem to be similar: restoring some glorious past from before the degenerate cyberpunk era. The nanotech technology is highly centralised and state-controlled.
The plot revolves around a threat to the hierarchical phyles: a book that would educate and empower the masses. Later it’s connected with a different form of nanotech that’s much more liberating and dangerous. 2/n
@isaacfreeman
> NeoVictorians and the Confucians. Both focus on bringing order by re-asserting traditional values and hierarchies
Make [insert national flag-wave here] great again! I'd say crypto-fascist Confucianism is very much the ideology of the CCP under Winny the Pooh.
@isaacfreeman @strypey @lightweight @DrCuriosity
Is it fair to say you're describing some of the larger phyles in Diamond Age as having a kind of nostalgia for past glory and restrictive-but-overall-stable social structure that you associate with fascism? That you're not saying all phyles are necessarily fashy, but the bigger ones we saw seemed that way?
It's a good while since I last read it, but I saw a phyle like the Ashanti as a group offering mutual support.
@isaacfreeman @strypey @lightweight @DrCuriosity
This raises questions about unions, gangs, guilds, confraternities and mutual societies. If the remains of the justice system are not effective for people like you, and the social welfare is extremely minimal, what do you do to make life better? What happens when "your tribe" - say the SCA, or your iwi - is also your economic support network? That brings up the big questions about groups and individuals.
@alix @strypey @lightweight @DrCuriosity Perfectly fair. There are lots of phyles with different worldviews, but the NeoVictorians seemed to be particularly influential globally, and the Confucians in China. It could be just the viewpoint of the characters, but I assumed that most phyles would have had similarly reactionary origins.
Also could be just me and my memory.
@DrCuriosity @isaacfreeman @strypey @lightweight
I wonder how much of this response is because the story spends so much time with the phyles that are more imperialist. Would you say the same if the main focus had been on the Armenians, the Senderos, the Ashanti or whatever the hacker phyle was called? (Are the Drummers a phyle?)
I’m currently pondering whether fascism remains a meaningful term if it can be applied to every society with an empire.
@alix @isaacfreeman @strypey @lightweight
I'm not making commentary on phyles in general, but the Vickies and their described attributes specifically. Though in passing, worth noting that the terms "phyle" and "thete" are implicitly ones of class.
I can't really speak to most of the other phyles as they weren't really described in significant detail.
Best I could tell, the Drummers were a kind of nanotech hivemind. Possibly a phyle of sorts, but porous.
@alix
> whether fascism remains a meaningful term if it can be applied to every society with an empire
Thank you for saying this! The meaning of "fascism" has been stretched to breaking point in recent years (arguably well past it) by overly general use. Mind you, I remember when I was a stroppy young anarcho-punk, and used "Nazi" or "fascist" to describe pretty much anyone I thought was conservative and authoritarian. Pot? Kettle? Maybe ; )
(1/2)
@alix
Now i'm a crusty old anarcho-punk. I've learned a *lot* more about political history, not to mention the danger of diluting the meanings of important political terms, by using them as discursive tommy guns. Can't deny it was cathartic though.
(2/2)
George Orwell, writing already in 1944:
It will be seen that, as used, the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation, of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley’s broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else.
https://www.orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc
@kravietz
> It will be seen that, as used, the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless
George Orwell, as always, is right on the money. Any social media warriors who want to retrospectively cancel Orwell for being 'soft on fascism' by saying this, will need reminding that he fought real fascists in Spain (both the native ones and the exotic "left-wing" Stalinist variant). With a *gun*, not a keyboard.
@kravietz
If pseudo-pomo representationists had as much courage as George Orwell had in his little finger - let alone a fraction of his political insight - we'd all be in a much better situation.
@strypey @[email protected] @DrCuriosity @alix @lightweight I’m sympathetic to being precise in language, but on balance I come down the other way on this, for a few reasons:
1. Fascism is concerned with power, not consistent policy, so it was hard to pin down a precise definition even in Orwell’s time. Some only count Italian fascism, others include German and Spanish. Japan is sometimes handwaved in. You’ve included Stalin, whom I’d have called history’s foremost antifascist.
1/n
@strypey @DrCuriosity @alix @lightweight
3. Organised far right groups often extend their influence by offering deniability to the much larger sphere of fellow travelers who aren’t formal members. This also allows centrists to deny the extent of fascism by defining it too strictly.
Given these, I’m comfortable using the term ‘fascism’ in a broader sense than Orwell. If people in a discussion prefer ‘fascistic’ or ‘totalitarian’ or whatever, I’ll happily follow their lead in that context. 3/3
@isaacfreeman
> Also the sequel _The Diamond Age_, which made the insightful point that a chaotic cyberpunk world isn’t a stable end state to history
Didn't know this was a Snowcrash sequel and haven't read it yet. Will head to the public library at the next opportunity.
@lightweight
> think they might be read for Diamond Age
... after Snowcrash, surely? If it's a sequel...
@isaacfreeman @lightweight @strypey
Quoting>>>
"Chiselled Spam," Miss Matheson said, sort of mumbling it to herself.
"Pardon me, Miss Matheson?" Nell said.
"I was just watching the smart wheels and remember an advertisement from my youth," Miss Matheson said. "I used to be a thrasher, you know. I used to ride skateboards through the streets. Now I’m still on wheels, but a different kind. Got a few too many bumps and bruises during my earlier career, I’m afraid."
@isaacfreeman
Another book that makes this point beautifully is Accelerando by Charles Stross (from which I believe Lobster.rs takes it's name). Again, the main protagonist is not really a hero, but is a classic posthumanist nutter. Rapture of the Nerds, his collaboration with @pluralistic, picks up on this theme.
Stross also encoded some insightful monetary theory into Neptune's Brood (must read the whole series sometime).