Blue Sky is theoretically interesting, because of it's theoretically federated approach which will theoretically be open source.
I think the restricted invite approach has made it seem trendy.
But it's run by someone who is backing RFKjr which is deeply troubling.
Spoutible is not open about its moderation methods or team, or its development team. It has had repeated software and security issues, which the owner tends to lie about, and then attack the critics, even making those attacks personal.
And Twitter is intentionally being destroyed as an organizing platform for one party, while being strengthened as a propaganda-spreading platform for the other party.
@thomasafine How do these two offerings then end up any different from a Main Stream Media (tm) outlet that posts every article with a comments section below?
I mean, that's been toxic for as long as news outlets have been on the web. Comment in response to broadcast has never worked out to be "conversation", has it?
@Johannab I think those are toxic in part because nobody ever took them seriously. There's not a sense of community or anything.
I find Post feels sort of like social media and Substack doesn't. Not completely sure why. But I only plan to use substack as a place to write long-form articles that arebn't suited to social media.
@thomasafine
Substack is arguably designed to NOT seem like social media, to the extent that it's meant to allow people to develop their own quasi-independent brand. They were trying to have the best of all worlds: parasocial interaction with creators, but individual brands. Notes is supposed to create the sense of community, but it's not fully baked yet.
& then there's the weird shit about the platform like no one actually having a password until they force one to be created.
@Johannab