Medicare for All would save $450B a year.

Every dollar spent on food stamps generates $1.50-$1.80 in economic activity.

Each dollar going to low-wage workers adds $1.20 to the economy overall.

It’s not about what this country can or can’t afford.

It’s about priorities.

@rbreich just for comparison, how much do you spend in the military?
@mdione @rbreich a quick look on wikipedia states a military budget for 2023 of 782 billion
@flbr @rbreich it's a good thing, then, that you need more to protect people, than people to protect...</sarcasm>
@rbreich it’s about employer power by keeping employees desperate and dependent
@rbreich Just Medical for all, not Medicare. Fuck Insurance companies.
@Homoevolutis0 Subsidies does not require existence of insurance companies. They are not involved in subsidy process. It is all between poor patient and bored bureaucrat to whom you must prove that you are, literally, "poor enough" to get subsidy. This process is just have own pitfalls.

@Homoevolutis0 @rbreich

Someone, somewhere, has to do some gatekeeping. By this I mean someone has to be able to say "no" to unnecessary procedures and tests. It clogs the system and incurs unnecessary costs. This is from someone that relies on MediCal, arguably the best social health in the country

Don't get me started on dental health tho

@Homoevolutis0 @rbreich

Otoh non-profit should mean senior execs are there because they believe in health care, not because they get sweet salaries while pretending to be . non-profit

@rbreich As someone who has fought (and lost) with CMS before, I just wish we could talk about other universal-health-care options besides MFA. Like the hybrid systems other countries use. You get subsidies, you get options and competition, and you're not up against an uncaring monolith when something goes wrong.
@rbreich @hannu_ikonen Yes, sure, but who will think of the poor underpaid insurance industry executives?!?
@rbreich While I do agree with you, I also think it's not possible to create priorities in our polarized state.

@rbreich it's not about priorities, it's about objectives. Our government isn't trying to create a country where everyone is healthy, happy, and safe, they're trying to create a worker class that is desperate and hungry enough to work for any wage under any conditions.

This is all intentional and will continue getting worse until capitalism is dismantled. There is no other way.

@rbreich It’s about what we should want to be.
@rbreich
it's about greed and prejudice
@rbreich Fully concur; priorities for the .01%, jackels sucking at the day trade of Wall St., and the military-industrial complex

@rbreich

Makes you wonder what rich people think food stamps and WIC get spent on.

(Hint: grocery stores wouldn't accept those if they weren't profitable).

@rbreich

"Humane health care is achieved when the rich and the poor receive the same treatment."
SearingTruth

@rbreich … and how nasty you can be despite the obvious economic benefits. Of course, it won’t be for *your* [or anybody’s] *exclusive* benefit, which might take the edge off it a bit …
@rbreich This is pretty much the situation with free school lunches, too. Costs more to administer an exclusionary system than to feed all.
@rbreich it always seemed to me that those opposed to safety net programs assume that tax dollars are burned and not put into the economy