Why doesn't Canada have the same battles over affirmative action?

Simple: the Charter says that its Equal Protection provision "does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability."

It's litigated around the margins, but the basic premise of AA is firmly entrenched.

@jbe

Also they don’t have the electoral college. Without it, both Al Gore and Hillary Clinton would have won and we’d have a supermajority liberal SCOTUS.

Can’t disentangle the court from plain old politics imo.

@inklings
To be fair, Canada has its own very different Rube Goldberg methods of choosing its head of government* and Supreme Court justices. But point taken.

*(and a very, very different way of "choosing" its head of state!)